1991
DOI: 10.1080/02568549109594818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Talk: Sources of Support for the Development of Decontextualized Language Skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Decontextualized, or disembedded, language skills reflect an ability to talk about ideas and nonpresent objects or events-for example, referring to past and future events, requesting or sharing information, and expressing ideas and opinions unrelated to the immediate physical context (Olson, 1977;. In the Home School Study of Language and Literacy Development, Snow and colleagues found a wide range in decontextualized language use across four activities: book reading, talking about a past event, mealtime conversation, and talking while playing with toys Beals, De Temple, and Dickinson, 1994;De Temple and Beals, 1991). They also noted that decontextualized language use was associated with the literacy environment in the home.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Family Literacy Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Decontextualized, or disembedded, language skills reflect an ability to talk about ideas and nonpresent objects or events-for example, referring to past and future events, requesting or sharing information, and expressing ideas and opinions unrelated to the immediate physical context (Olson, 1977;. In the Home School Study of Language and Literacy Development, Snow and colleagues found a wide range in decontextualized language use across four activities: book reading, talking about a past event, mealtime conversation, and talking while playing with toys Beals, De Temple, and Dickinson, 1994;De Temple and Beals, 1991). They also noted that decontextualized language use was associated with the literacy environment in the home.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Family Literacy Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A decreasing reliance on the immediate physical (and to an extent the immediate social) context is frequently discussed as a feature of language use with preschoolers that is important to later school success, and this is often referred to as decontextualized language (e.g., De Temple & Beals, 1991;McKeown & Beck, 2003;Snow, 1983;Snow & Dickinson, 1991;Watson, 2001). Talk in CT is more often about the immediate physical context (perceptually present objects and events), and this is even more pronounced in talking with preschoolers.…”
Section: Degree Of Social and Physical Contextual Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and amount of talk between caregivers and young children has been found to have a significant effect on language use and literacy development (Beals, 2001;Beals et al, 1994;Collins and Michaels, 1980;Davidson and Snow, 1995;DeTemple and Beals, 1991;Dickinson and Tabors, 2001;Dunn and Dunn, 1981;Hart and Risley, 1995;Hoff and Naigles, 2002;Huttenlocher et al, 2002;Dickinson and Tabors, 2001;Weizman and Snow, 2001), and may be related to within-culture differences in language tradition (e.g., Collins and Micheals, 1980;Heath, 1982). For example, Weizman and Snow (2001) found that the number of words in adult talk in adult-child dyads was positively associated with child vocabulary production and that the most sophisticated levels of talk (in terms of the vocabulary used) occurred during shared book reading, which has also been found to be a significant predictor of reading performance (e.g., Hart and Risley, 1995;Sénéchal and LeFevre, 2002).…”
Section: Oral Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%