2002
DOI: 10.1353/nar.2002.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Stories: Gender and Discourse in Atom Egoyan's The Sweet Hereafter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This premise helps to situate Banks's portrayal of Billy as Vietnam vet simultaneously representative of a more generally fallen American masculinity. 6 The argument that Billy provides an alternative form of fatherhood is more convincingly made in reference to Egoyan's film adaptation (see Weese, 2002), which eliminates inclusion of the episode involving Jessica in Jamaica. In fact, Egoyan eliminates Billy's narrative role, limiting narrative perspective to Mitch for the first half of the movie and to Nichole for the second half, and thereby deprives viewers of the insight into Billy's emotional and psychological life offered to Banks's readers.…”
Section: The Soldiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This premise helps to situate Banks's portrayal of Billy as Vietnam vet simultaneously representative of a more generally fallen American masculinity. 6 The argument that Billy provides an alternative form of fatherhood is more convincingly made in reference to Egoyan's film adaptation (see Weese, 2002), which eliminates inclusion of the episode involving Jessica in Jamaica. In fact, Egoyan eliminates Billy's narrative role, limiting narrative perspective to Mitch for the first half of the movie and to Nichole for the second half, and thereby deprives viewers of the insight into Billy's emotional and psychological life offered to Banks's readers.…”
Section: The Soldiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyd quotes Egoyan as saying: "There was no way I could depict the incest in the way it was in the book because it had become a cliché." For analysis of Egoyan's treatment of incest in adaptation, see in addition toBoyd, Gruben (2006),Weese (2002), andMay and Ferri (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%