2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1504-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family specific genetic predisposition to breast cancer: results from Tunisian whole exome sequenced breast cancer cases

Abstract: BackgroundA family history of breast cancer has long been thought to indicate the presence of inherited genetic events that predispose to this disease. In North Africa, many specific epidemio-genetic characteristics have been observed in breast cancer families when compared to Western populations. Despite these specificities, the majority of breast cancer genetics studies performed in North Africa remain restricted to the investigation of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Thus, comprehensive data at a whole exome or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the c.-176C > T variant, no information published about their impact or functionality on CDH1 gene expression. The variants c.2164 + 17dupA and c.2439 + 52G > A, alters exonic splicing sites (ESS and ESE), the c.2164 + 17dupA is a common non-coding variant observed in 13/20 patients in our study, it is considered as benign by ClinVar, also, it was found in patients with breast cancer but was considered as no pathogenic [20]). On the other hand, the c.2439 + 52G > A variant was observed in our study only in one patient, the clinical significance information is not yet reported in ClinVar, so in both cases the functional role need be clarified in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For the c.-176C > T variant, no information published about their impact or functionality on CDH1 gene expression. The variants c.2164 + 17dupA and c.2439 + 52G > A, alters exonic splicing sites (ESS and ESE), the c.2164 + 17dupA is a common non-coding variant observed in 13/20 patients in our study, it is considered as benign by ClinVar, also, it was found in patients with breast cancer but was considered as no pathogenic [20]). On the other hand, the c.2439 + 52G > A variant was observed in our study only in one patient, the clinical significance information is not yet reported in ClinVar, so in both cases the functional role need be clarified in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…BARD1 isoforms caused by genetic mutations or SNPs are upregulated in many tumors [ 13 , 14 , 18 , 96 , 122 ]. Interestingly, few of the genetic mutations discussed here are present in and influence the risk of developing breast and gynecological cancers, suggesting that some of these BARD1 SNPs may be cancer-specific ( Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 ) [ 19 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 ]. Whether BARD1 variants are secondary to treatment or part of the oncogenic progression has not been fully elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KRT18 is a known triple negative breast cancer marker and has also been reported to play a role as oncogene in colorectal cancer [ 41 , 42 ]. PABPC3 was found to have germline mutation in a breast cancer cohort of Tunisian females [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%