2022
DOI: 10.1332/204674321x16449322694920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family sociology as a theoretical enterprise? A personal reflection

Abstract: David Morgan’s contributions to family sociology started from a direct engagement with theoretical perspectives, but his 1996 publication, Family Connections, took his family sociology in a new, somewhat ‘fuzzy’ direction. Two key motifs for his later work are the emphasis on ‘family’ as an adjective, and its fruitfulness when conjoined with the doing of ‘practices’. Yet his 1996 text also identified key theoretical themes he considered important for family sociology to retain. I trace some of the theoretical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such questions and possibilities – even while primarily drawn from, and limited to, a family sociology rooted in affluent Minority World contexts (Ribbens McCarthy, 2022) – have the potential for new understandings of personhood and how ‘family’ and ‘family’ relationships feature in people’s imaginations and everyday relational lives and practices after the death of a significant other, alongside attention to the social patterns and structures of inequality of power and resources that are interwoven with death and its continuing aftermath. Further key questions remain to be considered concerning how the continuing aftermath of death in the lives of the living may be theorised, and how it may be experienced, in the full diversity of radical human and post-human relationality, inevitably embroiled with historic and contemporary issues of global power and inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such questions and possibilities – even while primarily drawn from, and limited to, a family sociology rooted in affluent Minority World contexts (Ribbens McCarthy, 2022) – have the potential for new understandings of personhood and how ‘family’ and ‘family’ relationships feature in people’s imaginations and everyday relational lives and practices after the death of a significant other, alongside attention to the social patterns and structures of inequality of power and resources that are interwoven with death and its continuing aftermath. Further key questions remain to be considered concerning how the continuing aftermath of death in the lives of the living may be theorised, and how it may be experienced, in the full diversity of radical human and post-human relationality, inevitably embroiled with historic and contemporary issues of global power and inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key baseline involves vigorous critiques of the term ‘family’ itself, which have developed since the 1980s (reviewed by Ribbens McCarthy et al, 2019), questioning whether it should be used as a sociological term at all. Morgan (1996, 2003, 2011) notably suggests that ‘family’ might be more useful as an adjective or potentially a verb, rather than a noun indicating a categorical object, and his introduction of the term ‘family practices’ has been extensively taken up (Almack, 2022; Ribbens McCarthy, 2022).…”
Section: ‘Family’ Sociology and The Aftermath Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation