2007
DOI: 10.1177/0306624x06287104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Role in the Reintegration Process of Recovering Drug Addicts

Abstract: In an outcome evaluation of recovering addicts who participated in a prison-based therapeutic community, 39 clients, a nonrandomized subsample, are interviewed about their rehabilitation and reintegration experience. This study focuses on the family as the main source of support and as an agent of change for the recovering drug addict. Although many studies show marriage and family to be positively related to successful reintegration and rehabilitation, clients in this study report families as having a negativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As age increases (irrespective of sentence length), former prisoners are less likely to find themselves with social support as time passes after incarceration. The current trial did not asses contributors to the age discrepancy, but some factors may include perceptions that older adults (a) should be more self‐sufficient (Laub & Sampson, ), (b) may have more extensive criminal or substance abuse backgrounds with limited positive social support (Gideon, ), or (c) have more “burned bridges” with those would‐be support providers (Naser & La Vigne, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As age increases (irrespective of sentence length), former prisoners are less likely to find themselves with social support as time passes after incarceration. The current trial did not asses contributors to the age discrepancy, but some factors may include perceptions that older adults (a) should be more self‐sufficient (Laub & Sampson, ), (b) may have more extensive criminal or substance abuse backgrounds with limited positive social support (Gideon, ), or (c) have more “burned bridges” with those would‐be support providers (Naser & La Vigne, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the quality of social bonds is widely recognized as a salient factor affecting adult crime and deviance in general (Sampson & Laub, 2003; Sampson et al, 2006), and former prisoners’ reentry and reintegration in particular (Gideon, 2007; Laird, 2013; Naser & Visher, 2006; Travis, 2005), we included every respondent’s family relationship as one proxy of adult social bonds. The variable of family bonds was constructed adaptively from the scale for family relationship that was used in the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SS; Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It leads to devastating social costs to the community as well as personal cost to the offender. International research has shown consistently that absence of place of residence, material deprivations experienced by the returning prisoners and the role played by family facilitates recidivism (Baldry, 2006, Gideon, 2007.…”
Section: Recidivism Linked To Poor Rehabilitation Of the Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also makes adjustment to society more problematic, it is not easy to obtain employment, offenders become alienated from their families and the community. According to (Gideon, 2007) low quality relationships between the offender and the family leads to conflicts which ultimately results in their reoffending behaviours. Due to ineffective rehabilitation they are not able to acquire communication skills that help in interacting with others and in getting meaningful employment outside the prison.…”
Section: Recidivism Linked To Poor Rehabilitation Of the Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%