The Roman Family in the Empire 2005
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268412.003.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Relations in Roman Lusitania: Social Change in a Roman Province?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One part was often larger than the others suggesting that one family was considered senior to the others. Other studies have also argued for some continuity in Egypt, North Africa and Lusitania (Alston 2005;Corbier 2005;Edmondson 2005 respectively).…”
Section: Figure 2: Distribution Of Age-statements On Tombstones From mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One part was often larger than the others suggesting that one family was considered senior to the others. Other studies have also argued for some continuity in Egypt, North Africa and Lusitania (Alston 2005;Corbier 2005;Edmondson 2005 respectively).…”
Section: Figure 2: Distribution Of Age-statements On Tombstones From mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, several of these studies claim to have identified evidence of nuclear families. A rich historiography generally supports that the Roman family was nuclear [8][9][10] based on various sources, especially funeral epigraphy [11][12][13] and the analysis of Roman law [14], which inheritance rules were inconsistent with a high kinship intensity system. After the fall of the Roman Empire-though before the advent of the MFP-population censuses [15][16][17][18], analyses of house sizes [19], as well as family organizations depicted in Saints vitae [20] all suggest that the nuclear family was also dominant then, while Saint Augustine [The City of God, XV, 16] testifies that cousin marriage was already socially rejected in the fifth century (we provide further discussion of this historical evidence in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%