Handbook of Identity Theory and Research 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Processes and Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…I hypothesized that relations with both parents were related to identity statuses. In particular, I expected that individuals in achievement and closure would display a higher level of autonomy given by parents, whereas individuals in the other statuses would show a lower level of this relation (Koepke & Denissen, 2012;Scabini & Manzi, 2011). Moreover, I hypothesized that emerging adults in the moratorium and searching moratorium statuses would report a higher level of cohesion than participants in achievement and early closure (Willemsen & Waterman, 1991).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I hypothesized that relations with both parents were related to identity statuses. In particular, I expected that individuals in achievement and closure would display a higher level of autonomy given by parents, whereas individuals in the other statuses would show a lower level of this relation (Koepke & Denissen, 2012;Scabini & Manzi, 2011). Moreover, I hypothesized that emerging adults in the moratorium and searching moratorium statuses would report a higher level of cohesion than participants in achievement and early closure (Willemsen & Waterman, 1991).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research emphasizes the role of family in the process of identity development (Koepke & Denissen, 2012;Michałek & Rostowska, 2014). Scabini and Manzi (2011) stated that the process of shaping young people's identity takes place through the mutual differentiation of family members, which is responsible for the release of family members from each other, but maintaining emotional links. Reciprocity is expressed in the fact that not only does the adolescent show the need of independence from the family, but the family as a system must also allow this process or encourage it.…”
Section: Family Relations With Parents and Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Flexible families are open to new challenges, interpretations, and ideas, and find ways to adjust during the transitions of adolescence; less flexible families find transitions and adapting to change more challenging. 34,35 Healthy levels of family cohesion promote the emotional support that enables individuals or family relationships to remain resilient through challenges. Families at the extremes of cohesiveness may not adequately nurture adolescent transition to adulthood.…”
Section: Why Parents and Family Matter For Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3438 At the other extreme, families with low cohesion may be so individualized, there is little emotional involvement and support. 34,35 …”
Section: Why Parents and Family Matter For Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por sua vez a individualidade é caracterizada como a independência do jovem à autoridade parental, marcada pela mudança de autoridade unilateral para uma autoridade de cooperação e de reciprocidade, com tendência à progressão durante a adolescência e a jovem adultez (Mota & Rocha, 2012). Scabini e Manzi (2011) acrescentam que um contexto familiar favorável, com relacionamentos de qualidade, propicia um processo de individuação bem sucedido.…”
unclassified