2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family presence, family firm reputation and perceived financial performance: Empirical evidence from the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a clear theoretical link between corporate reputation and financial performance, the literature reveals mixed empirical evidences. Some studies report positive impacts of corporate reputation on subsequent financial performance (Deephouse, 2000; Roberts and Dowling, 2002; Eberl and Schwaiger, 2005; Anderson and Smith, 2006; Alvarado-Vargas, 2013; Hall and Lee, 2014; Raithel and Schwaiger, 2015; Chen, 2016; Castilla-Polo et al , 2018; Kaur and Singh, 2018; Santiago et al , 2019). Meanwhile, others find negative association between corporate reputation and financial performance (Liu et al , 2014; Hassan et al , 2015; Phillips et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite a clear theoretical link between corporate reputation and financial performance, the literature reveals mixed empirical evidences. Some studies report positive impacts of corporate reputation on subsequent financial performance (Deephouse, 2000; Roberts and Dowling, 2002; Eberl and Schwaiger, 2005; Anderson and Smith, 2006; Alvarado-Vargas, 2013; Hall and Lee, 2014; Raithel and Schwaiger, 2015; Chen, 2016; Castilla-Polo et al , 2018; Kaur and Singh, 2018; Santiago et al , 2019). Meanwhile, others find negative association between corporate reputation and financial performance (Liu et al , 2014; Hassan et al , 2015; Phillips et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature revealed mixed empirical evidences regarding the impacts of reputation on firm performance. While there is a substantial amount of research which affirms the positive impacts of corporate reputation on subsequent financial performance (Deephouse, 2000; Roberts and Dowling, 2002; Eberl and Schwaiger, 2005; Anderson and Smith, 2006; Alvarado-Vargas, 2013; Hall and Lee, 2014; Raithel and Schwaiger, 2015; Chen, 2016; Castilla-Polo et al , 2018; Kaur and Singh, 2018; Santiago et al , 2019), the inverse impacts are also well-documented (Liu et al , 2014; Hassan et al , 2015; Phillips et al , 2015). Meanwhile, others found no significant reputation-performance link (Rose and Thomsen, 2004; Inglis et al , 2006; Tischer and Hildebrandt, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before assessing it, it is required to acknowledge what, how and to which direction certain activities or happenings formulate an SFF's image (Astrachan et al, 2018). Santiago, Pandey and Manalac (2019) and Tong (2007) suggested the family's involvement into the business operation has a positive impact on reputation. It functions as a differentiator from peers (Urde & Greyser, 2016) and thus it is a valuable intangible asset (Wang-Yu-Chiang, 2016).…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research suggests family firms often possess unique characteristics and sources of competitive advantage relative to nonfamily firms (Bratnicka-Myśliwiec et al, 2019;LABAKI, 2018;Moaşa, 2019;Phua, 2017;Sandlin, 2017). These unique and inimitable resources enable family firms to achieve and sustain superior levels of financial performance over time (Cirillo et al, 2020;Kallmuenzer & Peters, 2018;Martínez-Romero et al, 2020;Saidat et al, 2019;Santiago et al, 2019;Zahra et al, 2008). Consistent with these potential sources of advantages, some studies show family firms have higher average levels of financial and market performance than nonfamily firms (Anderson & Reeb, 2003;Mishra et al, 2001;Sraer & Thesmar, 2007).…”
Section: Public Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 93%