2003
DOI: 10.1067/men.2003.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: Practices of critical care and emergency nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

6
98
5
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
98
5
10
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Research has repeatedly shown that nurses are not uniformly supportive of FPDR with adult patients, 2,26-28 and thus FPDR is not commonly implemented at the bedside. In fact, only approximately one-third of nurses from across practice settings implement FPDR in their bedside care, 2,27,28 and recent research suggests an even lower implementation rate in critical care, 26 despite frequent opportunities for implementation owing to the fact that 45% of in-hospital cardiac arrests occur in a critical care setting. 17 Without nursing support, it is highly likely that FPDR will not be implemented and family-centered care will not be upheld.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Research has repeatedly shown that nurses are not uniformly supportive of FPDR with adult patients, 2,26-28 and thus FPDR is not commonly implemented at the bedside. In fact, only approximately one-third of nurses from across practice settings implement FPDR in their bedside care, 2,27,28 and recent research suggests an even lower implementation rate in critical care, 26 despite frequent opportunities for implementation owing to the fact that 45% of in-hospital cardiac arrests occur in a critical care setting. 17 Without nursing support, it is highly likely that FPDR will not be implemented and family-centered care will not be upheld.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family presence has been put into practice through the support of professional organizations such as ENA, which included family presence in its trauma nurse course curriculum (TNCC) and also in the emergency nursing pediatric course (ENPC) (MacLean et al, 2003). Despite this growth, as of 2007 only 5% of hospitals had a policy pertaining to family presence (Mian, Warchal, Whitney, Fitzmaurice and Tancredi, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses often feel that having a loved one at the bedside can provide closure when he/she is aware that every effort was made. Other benefits can include gaining a relationship and providing familial support (MacLean et al, 2003). Implementing family presence requires vigilant nurses who, during resuscitation, advocate for what is best for the patient, which may or may not include family presence at the bedside.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Despite recommendations from professional organizations, consensus conferences, joint position and policy statements, and clinical practice guidelines regarding family presence during resuscitation, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] only 5% of critical care units in the United States, 27 8% in Canada, 28 and 7% in Europe 29 have written policies that allow family presence. Surveys of nurses' practice indicate that many, if not most, critical care nurses have been asked by patients' family members if they could be present during resuscitation and invasive procedures and have brought such families to the bedside, despite the lack of formal written hospital policies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of nurses' practice indicate that many, if not most, critical care nurses have been asked by patients' family members if they could be present during resuscitation and invasive procedures and have brought such families to the bedside, despite the lack of formal written hospital policies. [27][28][29][30] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%