2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family ownership and productivity: the role of owner-management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
196
1
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
18
196
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we also include the number of patents of a firm as a control variable. Existing literature shows that the board and ownership structure can have implications for firm performance (Barth et al 2005;Core et al 1999); therefore, we include the number of directors on the board and whether the subsidiary is a publicly listed firm as control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we also include the number of patents of a firm as a control variable. Existing literature shows that the board and ownership structure can have implications for firm performance (Barth et al 2005;Core et al 1999); therefore, we include the number of directors on the board and whether the subsidiary is a publicly listed firm as control variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martikainen et al (2009) investigates on family-owned enterprises and finds that S&P500 firms that are controlled by families are more ingenious in their administration and subsequently perform better than their counterparts. In contrary, Norwegian companies document a negative relationship between family ownership and firm performance, especially in situations where the main decision-makers are family members (Barth et al, 2005). This is supported by the findings of Koke & Renneboog (2005), whereby they concur that the presence of substantial external shareholders positively influences firm performance amongst UK companies.…”
Section: Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 73%
“…It was assumed that a family firm was one where members of one family owned more than 25% of the shares in the company. A similar approach can be found in other works regarding the Polish market (Kowalewski, Talavera and Stetsyuk, 2010); for foreign markets, other values are accepted, e.g., 20% (La Porta, Lopez-deSilanes and Shleifer, 1999) or 33% (Barth, Gulbrandsen and Schone, 2005). It is worth mentioning that among the surveyed companies, which were considered as family businesses according to the criterion of ownership, the vast majority of family members also sat on the company management board.…”
Section: The Activity Of Family Firms On the Ipo Market In Poland In mentioning
confidence: 81%