2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.062329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family of bound entangled states on the boundary of the Peres set

Abstract: Bound entangled (BE) states are strange in nature: non-zero amount of free entanglement is required to create them but no free entanglement can be distilled from them under local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Even though usefulness of such states has been shown in several information processing tasks, there exists no simple method to characterize them for an arbitrary composite quantum system. Here we present a (d − 3)/2-parameter family of BE states each with positive partial transpose (PPT).… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the difficulties in detecting and quantifying entangled states in general and more so for multipartite genuine entanglement, construction of subspaces possessing such properties apriori is a systematic way forward. Several algorithms for constructing completely entangled subspaces (CES) -subspace containing no product vector -are known for bipartite as well as multipartite scenarios [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. However, in a multipartite scenario, as entanglement appears in different inequivalent forms, a coherent formalism to construct subspaces containing only a particular type of entanglement is more demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the difficulties in detecting and quantifying entangled states in general and more so for multipartite genuine entanglement, construction of subspaces possessing such properties apriori is a systematic way forward. Several algorithms for constructing completely entangled subspaces (CES) -subspace containing no product vector -are known for bipartite as well as multipartite scenarios [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. However, in a multipartite scenario, as entanglement appears in different inequivalent forms, a coherent formalism to construct subspaces containing only a particular type of entanglement is more demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are now ready to give a systematic protocol to do so: (i) Consider the class of UPBs for which if the stopper is removed from the UPB then the rest is extendible to a full basis, e.g., UPBs which are given in Refs. [13,15,30]. (ii) Following these constructions, it is possible to construct real UPBs of the above kind.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will present two different entanglement assisted discrimination protocols. First, we show a class of UPB in 5 ⊗ 5 as follows, which has the structure of Fig.1 [36]. The state |F , known as the stopper state, is not shown, as it would cover the whole diagram.…”
Section: Entanglement Assisted Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the above UPB, the authors of [36] have presented that their nontrivial construction attributes a notable property compared to the trivial one which is always possible to distinguish few states perfectly from the UPB by orthogonality preserving LOCC. But in their case, not even a single state can be perfectly distinguished by such LOCC.…”
Section: Entanglement Assisted Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation