2008
DOI: 10.3386/w14156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Leave after Childbirth and the Health of New Mothers

Abstract: We would also like to thank Janet Currie, Karen Norberg, and participants at the 2008 SOLE and ASHE meetings for very helpful suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
116
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
8
116
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Provision of maternity leave has been shown to not necessarily correlate with utilization of maternity leave, which may corroborated in this study [2]. Because longer maternity leave may correlate with improvement in maternal mental health, it is in the interest of the orthopaedic community to weigh this benefit against the downside of taking time away from training [5].…”
Section: Reporting On Utilization Of Leavesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Provision of maternity leave has been shown to not necessarily correlate with utilization of maternity leave, which may corroborated in this study [2]. Because longer maternity leave may correlate with improvement in maternal mental health, it is in the interest of the orthopaedic community to weigh this benefit against the downside of taking time away from training [5].…”
Section: Reporting On Utilization Of Leavesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The studies included participants from Australia (Gartland et al, 2011;Whitehouse et al, 2013), Norway (Kiehl and White, 2003), Sweden (Kiehl and White, 2003), the USA (Chatterji and Markowitz, 2012;Kiehl and White, 2003;Schroeder, 2011), Canada (Baker and Milligan, 2008), and Lebanon (Saad e et al, 2010). The paid maternity leave allowances in each study setting are described in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Settings and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies were cross-sectional (Chatterji and Markowitz, 2012;Kiehl and White, 2003;Saad e et al, 2010), two were cohort (Gartland et al, 2011;Whitehouse et al, 2013) and two were repeated cross-sectional studies (Baker and Milligan, 2008;Schroeder, 2011), using random samples of the population at different time points to compare health outcomes before and after a maternity leave policy reform.…”
Section: Study Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it seems likely that these programs will be expanded, both within these states and to additional states, as research has increasingly shown that they provide health benefits for both mothers (Chatterji and Markowitz 2008) and infants (Berger, Hill, and Waldfogel 2005). However, their expansion might be delayed because of the existing patchwork of benefits provided by the US private sector, by far the largest provider of parental leave.…”
Section: Family Leave In Sweden and The United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%