2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0979.2002.00225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family involvement: The key to opening locked wards and closed minds

Abstract: Treatment under the traditional medical model has largely ignored the family's knowledge, expertise and potential therapeutic effects on hospitalized mentally ill people. This paper reviews the family's role as caregiver. It reports on an evaluation of services by caregivers. Its findings reflect views stated in other surveys in identifying the need for improvement in education and social support for families, greater family involvement in the patient's care and improvement in staff attitudes towards families.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, during colonial times in North America, families were the primary providers of care for relatives with mental health issues, but in the late 1800s and early 1900s, as industrialization and urbanization reshaped society, families were frequently blamed for failing to "manage" their "deviant" relatives, which served to justify institutionalization (Friesen-Grande, 2006;Jones, 2002;Lefley, 1996;Nichols & MacFarlane, 2001;Terkelsen, 1990). During the 1950s and 1960s, increased advocacy for human rights, combined with extensive use of psychopharmacology and the search for less expensive forms of treatment by the State, contributed to deinstitutionalization (Bassman, Baker, & Packard, 2009;Hatfield, 1997;Jubb & Shanley, 2002;Suissa, 2005). As a result, people were discharged into communities, often without adequate supports.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, during colonial times in North America, families were the primary providers of care for relatives with mental health issues, but in the late 1800s and early 1900s, as industrialization and urbanization reshaped society, families were frequently blamed for failing to "manage" their "deviant" relatives, which served to justify institutionalization (Friesen-Grande, 2006;Jones, 2002;Lefley, 1996;Nichols & MacFarlane, 2001;Terkelsen, 1990). During the 1950s and 1960s, increased advocacy for human rights, combined with extensive use of psychopharmacology and the search for less expensive forms of treatment by the State, contributed to deinstitutionalization (Bassman, Baker, & Packard, 2009;Hatfield, 1997;Jubb & Shanley, 2002;Suissa, 2005). As a result, people were discharged into communities, often without adequate supports.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discourse of personal and family failure needs to be challenged with policy and provisions that remove obstacles and promote participation by family and caregivers (Jubb & Shanley, 2002). New educational strategies will need to be worked out if better outcomes are to be achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPs need information, education, support, practical advice on managing the illness, and someone to listen to them (Gavois, Paulsson, Fridund, 2006;Jakobsen & Severinsson, 2006;Jubb & Shanley, 2002;Kim & Salyers, 2008;Marshall & Solomon, 2000;McAuliffe et al, 2009;Rose, 1998;Smith, 2003).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPs have reported feeling disregarded or dismissed as irrelevant by mental health providers, even when they have critical information such as exacerbation of symptoms to communicate to their participant's providers (Johnson, 2000). These experiences may leave them with feelings of resentment toward mental health providers and alienation from the mental health system (Doornbos, 2002;Goodwin & Happell, 2007;Gray, Robinson, Seddon, & Roberts, 2008;Jubb & Shanley, 2002;Kaas, Lee, & Peitzman, 2003;Nicholls & Pernice, 2009). …”
Section: Development Of Family Involvement Standards 83mentioning
confidence: 99%