2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00689.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Intervention in routine practice: it is possible!

Abstract: Family Intervention for individuals with schizophrenia has a wealth of evidence to attest its efficacy. However, there is little literature available about actual family work services, what they consist of and how they operate. With the publication of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines for schizophrenia in 2002, there is increased pressure on mental health services to deliver evidence-based Family Interventions to individuals with schizophrenia and their families. This article will outli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable that the services which are currently beginning to impact upon the delivery of family work in the UK are those where committed individuals championing the cause of families have continued to work in the same area and have had an impact upon services over time. Examples are the services in Somerset (Burbach et al , 2002; Smith and Velleman, 2002), the services in Bournemouth (Kelly and Newstead, 2004), and the Meriden Programme in the West Midlands which has been established since 1998 (Fadden et al , 2002). The area of introducing family work into services is therefore no place for the ‘hero innovator’ to arrive, hoping for quick successes and rapid change!…”
Section: Encouraging Change – Influencing the Three Key Groups Of Plamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that the services which are currently beginning to impact upon the delivery of family work in the UK are those where committed individuals championing the cause of families have continued to work in the same area and have had an impact upon services over time. Examples are the services in Somerset (Burbach et al , 2002; Smith and Velleman, 2002), the services in Bournemouth (Kelly and Newstead, 2004), and the Meriden Programme in the West Midlands which has been established since 1998 (Fadden et al , 2002). The area of introducing family work into services is therefore no place for the ‘hero innovator’ to arrive, hoping for quick successes and rapid change!…”
Section: Encouraging Change – Influencing the Three Key Groups Of Plamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the number of barriers mitigating against the delivery of family intervention, some services have been successful in implementing family interventions within general mental health services, including the community services supporting those experiencing psychosis (Burbach & Stanbridge, 2006;Fadden, 1997;Kelly & Newstead, 2004;Smith & Velleman, 2002;Stanbridge & Burbach, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, the difficulty in engaging clients and their carers during PEP has made the outcomes of the programs inconclusive [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%