2013
DOI: 10.3109/14659891.2013.799239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family intervention for the treatment and rehabilitation of drug addiction: an exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight papers were rejected as they did not describe the delivery of any specific intervention or the intervention was targeted at the relative with the addiction and not the AFM. Four papers met eligibility for our review (Table 3) (Tiburcio & Natera, 2003;de los Angeles Cruz-Almanza et al, 2006;Baharudin et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Eight papers were rejected as they did not describe the delivery of any specific intervention or the intervention was targeted at the relative with the addiction and not the AFM. Four papers met eligibility for our review (Table 3) (Tiburcio & Natera, 2003;de los Angeles Cruz-Almanza et al, 2006;Baharudin et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identified studies were one each from Malaysia (Baharudin et al, 2014), and Vietnam (Li et al, 2014); and two from Mexico (Tiburcio & Natera, 2003;de los Angeles Cruz-Almanza et al, 2006). One was a cross-sectional study (Baharudin et al, 2014), one a pilot cluster randomised control trial (RCT) (Li et al, 2014), and two were treatment cohorts (Tiburcio & Natera, 2003;de los Angeles Cruz-Almanza et al, 2006). In the cluster RCT, two centres received the intervention and the other two received standard care.…”
Section: Study Sample and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations