2013
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2013.806569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family intervention for psychosis: Impact of training on clinicians’ attitudes, knowledge and behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sin et al . () did not measure implementation, however did note increases in the FI trainee's attitude, knowledge, and behaviours consistent with working collaboratively with families and carers post‐training. Fadden and Heelis () conducted three focus groups with 27 health care staff and carers who had experience of implementing FI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sin et al . () did not measure implementation, however did note increases in the FI trainee's attitude, knowledge, and behaviours consistent with working collaboratively with families and carers post‐training. Fadden and Heelis () conducted three focus groups with 27 health care staff and carers who had experience of implementing FI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One quantitative cohort study (Jolley et al ., ) explored the outcomes of providing CBT training. Two quantitative and qualitative cohort analyses (Bailey et al ., ; Sin et al ., ), one qualitative study (Fadden & Heelis, ), and one service commentary (Smith & Velleman, ) explored the implementation of FI. Two cohort studies explored the implementation of CBT and FI through PSI training (McCann & Bowers, ; Sin & Scully, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations