1990
DOI: 10.1002/pros.2990170409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family history and the risk of prostate cancer

Abstract: A case-control study was performed to estimate the relative risk of developing prostate cancer for men with a positive family history. Extensive cancer pedigrees were obtained on 691 men with prostate cancer and 640 spouse controls. Fifteen percent of the cases but only 8% of the controls had a father or brother affected with prostate cancer (P less than .001). Men with a father or brother affected were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer as men with no relatives affected. In addition, there was a trend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
318
4
28

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 583 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
318
4
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies (Steinberg et al, 1990;Spitz et al, 1991) reported a higher rate of prostate cancer in family members of cases than in family members of controls. In our study, the difference in the number of brothers affected by the same malignant tumour could be the result of cases having more brothers than controls, although fathers, grandfathers and sons of cases more frequently had prostate cancer than the same relatives of controls; because the case group was not large enough, this association was not found to be an independent one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies (Steinberg et al, 1990;Spitz et al, 1991) reported a higher rate of prostate cancer in family members of cases than in family members of controls. In our study, the difference in the number of brothers affected by the same malignant tumour could be the result of cases having more brothers than controls, although fathers, grandfathers and sons of cases more frequently had prostate cancer than the same relatives of controls; because the case group was not large enough, this association was not found to be an independent one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence exists for a hereditary pre disposition to prostate cancer, but the proportion of all cases at tributable to a genetic cause is not large. To characterize familial prostate cancer, our group documented that a positive family history of prostate cancer is a useful index of individual risk (2,5) and that there is an increased risk for the development of prostate cancer both with an increasing number of affected rela tives and with earlier age at onset in the proband (i.e., identified case patient) (2,4). Using a test of various models to define this familial clustering, it is best explained by the autosomal domi nant inheritance of a rare, yet highly penetrant, gene that pre disposes men to the early development of prostate cancer (4).…”
Section: Sarah D Isaacs Lambertus a L M Kiemeney Agnes Baffoe-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study population and the method of data collection are described in detail elsewhere (2). The case families were ascertained through 741 consecutive probands undergoing radical prostatectomy for primary, clinically localized prostate cancer at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, between 1982 and 1989.…”
Section: Case-control Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 A meta-analysis of multiple studies suggested that the risk is higher for men with a brother affected than a father, and that the familial risk is higher for early onset disease. 9 In Sweden, a nation-wide registry of cases was used to document 3-to 10-fold higher risks in men with a family history and genetic factors account for 12% of the disease.…”
Section: Family History and Familial Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%