2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Formation Trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the Second Demographic Transition?

Abstract: This study examines family formation trajectories as a manifestation of the second demographic transition (SDT) in three countries, comparing and contrasting two post-socialist countries (Romania and the Russian Federation) with France as benchmark country advanced in the SDT. By examining combined partnership and fertility sequences and transcending the mainly descriptive nature of trajectory-based studies, the current study expands our knowledge by including key explanatory factors, such as cohort, country, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(51 reference statements)
5
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of joint decision-making, however, seems to be less evident in Northern Europe, where fertility is especially common in cohabiting unions and less closely tied to marriage or union transitions (Holland, 2013). 1 Fertility in cohabiting unions, in fact, is so commonplace that recent European studies of parenthood typically use the date of entry into coresidential unions – either cohabitation or marriage – as the starting point for charting subsequent fertility (see Perelli-Harris et al, 2012; Potarca, Mills, Lesnard, 2013). Much less emphasis is given to whether cohabiting unions end in marriage, placing the emphasis instead on whether these relationships last (in any form).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern of joint decision-making, however, seems to be less evident in Northern Europe, where fertility is especially common in cohabiting unions and less closely tied to marriage or union transitions (Holland, 2013). 1 Fertility in cohabiting unions, in fact, is so commonplace that recent European studies of parenthood typically use the date of entry into coresidential unions – either cohabitation or marriage – as the starting point for charting subsequent fertility (see Perelli-Harris et al, 2012; Potarca, Mills, Lesnard, 2013). Much less emphasis is given to whether cohabiting unions end in marriage, placing the emphasis instead on whether these relationships last (in any form).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal matching procedure compares all pairs of sequences and uses a non-parametric algorithm to compute the minimum distance, in terms of costly operations, to turn one sequence into another. The substitution costs were generated using a symmetric transition frequency-based substitution cost matrix and insertion/deletion (indel) costs were fixed at half the maximum substitution cost and standardised by the length of the longer sequence (Brzinsky-Fay et al, 2006;Potârcӑ, Mills, & Lesnard, 2013).The resulting distance matrix was used in the cluster analysis with the widely used Ward's algorithm. Notes: 17.98%, of employment states within the sample were recorded as professional/managerial, 39.67% as skilled, 17.00% as semi-skilled, 9.30% as unskilled, 6.67% as in education/ training, 5.88%, as not in paid work and 3.50% as a family carer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was largely descriptive and does not apply to contextual factors of reproductive behaviour in rural and urban areas. The problems associated with the high degree of aggregation of the information collected in routine national systems were also noted by other researchers [28]. Despite these limitations, this study on inequality in reproductive behaviour, with the information already available from public statistics, broadens knowledge about the fertility of women in the rural and urban areas of Poland.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 92%