Family focused interventions that address parental domestic violence and abuse, mental ill-health, and substance misuse in combination: A systematic review

Allen, Karen; Melendez‐Torres, G. J.; Ford, Tamsin; Bonell, Chris; Finning, Katie; Fredlund, Mary; Gainsbury, Alexa; Berry, Vashti

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270894

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 119 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Preventing problems, identifying children at risk, and providing support at the earliest opportunity could provide long-lasting bene ts, and interventions that acknowledge and account for the complex interactive nature of risks are needed (18, 19). There is currently a lack of interventions that address the complexities and interactions between risks including poverty (20,21), yet the integration and coordination of services is recommended within practice, policy, and research (20,22,23).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-production workshops with families experiencing multiple and interacting adversities including parental mental health, substance use, domestic violence, and poverty: intervention insights and principles from mothers, fathers, and young people

Muir,

Kedzior,

Barrett

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Clustering and co-occurring of family adversities, including mental health problems, substance use, domestic violence and abuse, as well as poverty can increase health and behavioural risks for children, which persist throughout the life course. Yet, interventions that acknowledge and account for the complex interactive nature of such risks are limited. This study aimed to develop intervention principles through exploring insights into the ways in which mothers, fathers, and young people who experience multiple and interacting adversities perceived an intervention may bring about positive change. Methods A series of six co-production workshops with mothers, fathers, and young people who experienced multiple and interacting adversities (n = 41) were iteratively conducted across two regions in England (London and North-East) by four researchers. Workshop content and co-production activities were informed by advisory groups. Data from facilitator notes and activities were analysed thematically, resulting in a set of intervention principles. Results The intervention principles highlighted that: (1) to reduce isolation and loneliness parents and young people wanted to be connected to services, resources, and peer support networks within their local community, particularly by a knowledgeable and friendly community worker; (2) to address feelings of being misunderstood, parents and young people wanted the development of specialised trauma informed training for practitioners and to have the space to build trusting, gradual, and non-stigmatising relationships with practitioners; and (3) to address the needs and strengths of individual family members, mothers, fathers, and young people wanted separate, tailored, and confidential support. Conclusions The current study has important implications for practice in supporting families that experience multiple and interacting adversities. The intervention principles from this study share common characteristics with other intervention models currently on offer in the United Kingdom, including social prescribing, but go beyond these to holistically consider the whole families’ needs, environments, and circumstances. There should be particular focus on the child’s as well as the mothers' and fathers' needs, independently of the family unit. Further refinement and piloting of the developing intervention are needed.

show abstract