2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500

Abstract: Little is known about the impact of family ownership and management on corporate social performance. Some scholars have suggested that family firms are not likely to act in a socially responsible manner, while others have indicated that socially responsible behavior on the part of the family firm protects the family's assets. This preliminary study compares the degree to which family and nonfamily firms are socially responsible using data from 1991 to 2000 from the S&P 500. Two hundred sixty-one firms (202 non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
862
6
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 893 publications
(971 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
33
862
6
17
Order By: Relevance
“…One study has investigated the corporate social performance of firms, comparing 202 non-family and 59 family firms that appeared on the Standard and Poor's 500 for ten years (Dyer & Whetten, 2006). These firms, while family owned, experienced high growth so they can also be considered entrepreneurial ventures.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study has investigated the corporate social performance of firms, comparing 202 non-family and 59 family firms that appeared on the Standard and Poor's 500 for ten years (Dyer & Whetten, 2006). These firms, while family owned, experienced high growth so they can also be considered entrepreneurial ventures.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These firms, while family owned, experienced high growth so they can also be considered entrepreneurial ventures. Dyer and Whetten (2006) used KLD data on corporate social performance to show that family firms appear more socially responsible than non-family firms, and that family firms had significantly fewer product, environmental and employee concerns -three social concern measuresthan non-family firms. This recent study hopefully will foster additional research focusing on CSR or ethical behaviours of firms, relying on more objective data rather than surveys asking entrepreneurs or business owners to report on their attitudes and behaviours.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For family owners, employee satisfaction in their daily work life is of high priority to increase employee retention, but also because their reputation in society is important -particularly if the company name entails the family name (Dyer and Whetten 2006).…”
Section: Family Specific Goals and Corporate Governance Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centrality -particularly in terms of power -arises through the owner manager's strong attachment to the firm, and the potential for the owner manager's identity to be interwoven between the family, and business (Dyer and Whetten, 2006). Handler's (1990) sequential model of role adjustment explains the process of succession through four stages, suggesting that the successor gradually adopts the owner manager's role to become the new leader.…”
Section: Transfer and Decision-making Powermentioning
confidence: 99%