1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1967.tb01896.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Environment and 11+ Success: Some Basic Predictors

Abstract: Summary. Our ability to analyse the socio‐cultural environment is vital to the development of research into the effects of social experience upon academic performance. This paper argues that, in the course of such development, there is an inevitable tendency to treat simple statistical predictors as indicators of causal mechanisms. An example of this problem is found in the way in which social class is often treated as a single experimental variable. In the present state of research sophistication it is bette… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crowdedness ratio of the home (number of persons divided by number of rooms) provided another index of economic level, as used in studies of SES effects in the United States (Bloom, Whiteman, & Deutsch, 1965;Deutsch, 1967;Tulkin, 1968;Tulkin & Newbrough, 1968), in Canada (Marjoribanks, 1972a), in England (Swift, 1967), and in Israel (Handel, 1973c;Yaffe & Smilansky, 1958).…”
Section: Measures Of Socioeconomic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowdedness ratio of the home (number of persons divided by number of rooms) provided another index of economic level, as used in studies of SES effects in the United States (Bloom, Whiteman, & Deutsch, 1965;Deutsch, 1967;Tulkin, 1968;Tulkin & Newbrough, 1968), in Canada (Marjoribanks, 1972a), in England (Swift, 1967), and in Israel (Handel, 1973c;Yaffe & Smilansky, 1958).…”
Section: Measures Of Socioeconomic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the Plowden Social Survey (1967) has shown that there are wide differences in ' parental aspiration ' within social class, and that this measure shows a much greater independent relationship with primary school attainment in reading than does the variable of ' father's occupation. ' Swift (1967) has stressed that ' social class ' is too broad a measure to describe the different home environments experienced by children. The significant differences in academic motivation within social class found in the present investigation reinforce this conclusion.…”
Section: Significance Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of greater importance is the finding that factors associated with achievement are generally less associated with social class. Suggestions regarding the relative lack of importance of social class made by Entwistle (1968), and Swift's (1967) suggestion that social class is too vague a concept to describe the different home environments of children-in spite of the correlations usually found-are supported by this study, as also are the findings of Cattell, Sealy, & Sweeny (1966) which showed that variance in achievement can be accounted for by personality differences and dynamic interest differences, besides other influences not necessarily related to ability or social class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that for different social class levels there are varying degrees of academic motivation and parental aspiration (see Children andTheir Primary Schools, 1967 andEntwistle, 1968), while Swift (1967) has suggested that social class is too crude a variable to "explain" differences in home environment. Nor can social class explain differences in school achievement, yet the relationship is persistent and requires exploration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%