Human offspring are weaned earlier than the offspring of other great apes but take longer to reach nutritional independence. An analysis of human disorders of imprinted genes suggests genes of paternal origin, expressed in infants, have been selected to favor more intense suckling than genes of maternal origin. The same analysis suggests that genes of maternal origin may favor slower childhood growth but earlier sexual maturation. These observations are consistent with a hypothesis in which slow maturation was an adaptation of offspring that reduced maternal fitness, whereas early weaning was an adaptation of mothers that reduced the fitness of individual offspring.Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome | genomic imprinting | Prader-Willi syndrome | weaning E thnographic data suggest our ancestors consumed more food than they gathered until early adulthood and gathered more food than they consumed thereafter (1). Thus, hominin life history involved a transfer of resources from older producers to younger consumers. Lee modeled the consequences of these transfers for the evolution of age-specific mortality (2, 3). He found that transfers from older to younger individuals mitigate the force of selection against early deaths, because the death of a dependent youngster frees food for other group members, but intensify selection against late-life mortality, because the death of a productive elder reduces food for survivors.Lee's model assumed consumers and producers were genetically identical, except for new mutations (2). It was as if older producers could provision their younger selves. In sexual life cycles, however, resources are transferred between individuals who may share some, but not all, of their genes (4). If multiple donors transfer resources to multiple recipients, then each donor favors the distribution of resources that maximizes her inclusive fitness, but each recipient favors the distribution that maximizes his inclusive fitness. Individual consumers are predicted to take a larger share of production (if given the opportunity) than the quantity favored by donors. The paradigm of such conflict is the allocation of maternal investment among offspring. If a mother distributes resources in a manner that maximizes her fitness, then each offspring will favor a reallocation from sibs to itself (5). Genes that are expressed differently when inherited via ova than via sperm are predicted to mediate kin conflicts (6, 7). Therefore, the phenotypic effects of such imprinted genes will provide important clues about how transfers among kin have shaped human life history.
Modeling Transfers Among KinPatterns of resource transfers within groups and gene transfers between groups are variable among modern human populations and were presumably variable among ancestral populations. Simplification of this complexity is necessary to gain theoretical insight into how resource and gene transfers interact. I will consider a simple gene-transfer model in which females move to new groups when they switch from being net consumers to net pr...