2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00282.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family cancer histories predictive of a high risk of hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer associate significantly with a genomic rearrangement in hMSH2 or hMLH1

Abstract: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) results from inactivating germline mutations in a set of DNA-mismatch-repair genes, of which the most clinically relevant are hMSH2 and hMLH1. Computer-assisted pedigree risk assessment tools are available to assist in the calculation of an individual's likelihood of bearing such a deleterious mutation. One such tool, cancergene version 3.4 (http://www3.utsouthwestern.edu/cancergene) was used to assess the risk of a deleterious mutation in the genes hMSH2 and/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with hundreds previous MLPA studies performed in various syndromes and diseases (Ainsworth et al, 2004;Madrigal et al, 2007;Priolo et al, 2008), we confirm that MLPA is an useful method to detect UBE3A exon deletions which otherwise would be missed using conventional gene-scanning methods. However, at the same time we need to claim about some limitations in the performance of MLPA for quantification analysis possibly leading to false positives as documented in our previous study (Calì et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In line with hundreds previous MLPA studies performed in various syndromes and diseases (Ainsworth et al, 2004;Madrigal et al, 2007;Priolo et al, 2008), we confirm that MLPA is an useful method to detect UBE3A exon deletions which otherwise would be missed using conventional gene-scanning methods. However, at the same time we need to claim about some limitations in the performance of MLPA for quantification analysis possibly leading to false positives as documented in our previous study (Calì et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In 1998, more relaxed criteria were introduced (Amsterdam II criteria [6]) to include cases of certain HNPCC-associated cancers other than colorectal cancer. A number of methods of identifying high-risk families have been proposed, with reference to both colorectal cancer and breast/ovarian cancer [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger gDNA alterations create effective hemizygosity for single exons and result in an EBESA profile that is indistinguishable from homozygosity for two normal LDLR alleles. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a new analytical method (11) that detects larger gDNA deletions or insertions that would otherwise be overlooked by EBESA (12). We hypothesized that some FH patients with no LDLR mutation detectable by EBESA would have an abnormality detectable using MLPA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%