2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family burden of compulsive hoarding: Results of an internet survey

Abstract: Compulsive hoarding, the acquisition of and failure to discard large numbers of possessions, is associated with substantial health risk, impairment in functioning, and economic burden. Despite clear indications that hoarding has a detrimental effect on people living with or near someone with a hoarding problem, no empirical research has examined these harmful effects. The aim of the present study was to examine the burden of hoarding on family members. Six hundred sixty-five family informants who reported havi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
138
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
138
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority (N 5 1153) of those excluded did not have hoarding; these participants were enrolled in other research which is described elsewhere. [23] MATERIALS Diagnosis and severity of compulsive hoarding was determined using the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR), [5] a self-report version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview (HRS-I). [24] Like the interview, the HRS-SR consists of 5 Likert-type ratings from 0 (none) to 8 (extreme) for clutter, difficulty discarding, excessive acquisition, distress, and impairment.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (N 5 1153) of those excluded did not have hoarding; these participants were enrolled in other research which is described elsewhere. [23] MATERIALS Diagnosis and severity of compulsive hoarding was determined using the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR), [5] a self-report version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview (HRS-I). [24] Like the interview, the HRS-SR consists of 5 Likert-type ratings from 0 (none) to 8 (extreme) for clutter, difficulty discarding, excessive acquisition, distress, and impairment.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a series of recent epidemiological studies have been conducted using reliable and valid psychometric instruments, which closely mirror the proposed diagnostic criteria, such as the Savings Inventory-Revised [28] and the Hoarding Rating Scale SelfReport. [29,84] The prevalence of clinically significant compulsive hoarding is estimated to be in the region of 2-5% of the general population. [20][21]42] The consequences of which are clinically significant distress or disability.…”
Section: Should Compulsive Hoarding Be Included As a Separate Diagnosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior can lead to significantly cluttered living space in the home and can cause considerable distress and impairment in functioning for individuals and their family members (Tolin et al, 2008). The clutter may interfere with the normal use of space for basic household activities and increase the risk of injuries due to fire and falling, and illnesses due to poor sanitation, as well as legal citations and evictions from home by public health authorities .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%