2014
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Beliefs and Behaviors About Smoking and Young Children’s Secondhand Smoke Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another explanation is that the presence of thirdhand smoke on the caregiver, carpeting, or household surfaces could raise a child's salivary cotinine measurement (33). Future community intervention studies need to focus on how to increase full implementation of SHSe protection for children across all settings, and how to successfully promote smoking cessation for low-income families (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation is that the presence of thirdhand smoke on the caregiver, carpeting, or household surfaces could raise a child's salivary cotinine measurement (33). Future community intervention studies need to focus on how to increase full implementation of SHSe protection for children across all settings, and how to successfully promote smoking cessation for low-income families (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We furthermore found that men, people aged 25-39 years, people with a high socioeconomic background, and never smokers were most likely to have implemented a complete home smoking ban. These findings are in line with several previous studies (Hilliard et al, 2015;Mons et al, 2013;Zhang, Martinez-Donate, Kuo, Jones, & Palmersheim, 2012). Future research should investigate how acceptance of smoking in public places and the implementation of home smoking bans interact or are causally related to each other.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in line with several previous studies. 19,32,33 Future research should investigate how acceptance of smoking in public places and the implementation of home smoking bans interact or are causally related to each other. We found in our study that public smoking restrictions did not lead to compensation by more smoking at home, but rather added to denormalization of smoking by a decrease in smoking at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%