2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family-based association tests for quantitative traits using pooled DNA

Abstract: Interest in whole-genome QTL mapping has spurred efforts to reduce the cost of studies now based primarily on individual genotyping. Pooled DNA tests are a possible solution, and understanding how measurement error affects test power could assist in study design. Here we describe pooled tests explicitly optimised for measurement error, including family-based tests robust to population stratification. Our results suggest that pooled DNA whole-genome screens may be feasible with current instruments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach is to pool the most invasive and least invasive organoids, and then to perform genomic analysis of the pooled upper and lower tails. We have shown that power is optimized by selecting the upper and lower 27%, with efficiency equivalent to individual measurements of a population 80% as large; the selection threshold and efficiency are robust to sibship size, effect size, and allele frequency in the context of genetic studies [27].…”
Section: Pooled Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is to pool the most invasive and least invasive organoids, and then to perform genomic analysis of the pooled upper and lower tails. We have shown that power is optimized by selecting the upper and lower 27%, with efficiency equivalent to individual measurements of a population 80% as large; the selection threshold and efficiency are robust to sibship size, effect size, and allele frequency in the context of genetic studies [27].…”
Section: Pooled Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal proportion of the distribution of individuals to include in such analysis was shown to be 27% under the circumstances where no measurement error was involved (Bader et al, 2002). In this study we investigated the comparative NCP that would be expected from selection proportions between 5% and 25% with measurement error of 0.0009.…”
Section: The Optimal Extreme Proportion Of the Distribution For Inclumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One proposed strategy to reduce cost is the use of pooled DNA as a screening device, before following up interesting findings with individual genotyping and analysis (Downes et al, 2004;Norton et al, 2004;Sham et al, 2002). Although initially used for case-control designs, methods have also been derived for family based association studies (Bader and Sham, 2002;Risch and Teng, 1998). Recently it has been demonstrated that microarray technology can be used to accurately measure allele frequencies in pooled samples (Butcher et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case-parents design needs to genotype two controls (the biological parents) for each affected individual rather than the one control typical with case-control designs. To reduce the genotyping needed for family-based association studies while preserving robustness and statistical efficiency, several authors proposed comparing variant allele frequencies measured in pooled DNA specimens (Zou & Zhao, 2005, Risch & Teng, 1998, Bader & Sham, 2002, Lee, 2005, Beckman et al , 2006). Here we propose a method to analyze pooled DNA specimens based on probabilistically disaggregating the pooled genotypes into their component individual genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%