Revisiting Family Leisure Research 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781351036429-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Activity Model: Crossroads of Activity Environment and Family Interactions in Family Leisure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential reason for the different results reported in this study and studies employing the CBM can be explained by Melton’s (2017) Family Activity Model (FAM). Based on FAM, whether activities are considered core or balance should be determined based on the degree to which leisure occurs in a novel or predictable activity environment, not based on the activity per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One potential reason for the different results reported in this study and studies employing the CBM can be explained by Melton’s (2017) Family Activity Model (FAM). Based on FAM, whether activities are considered core or balance should be determined based on the degree to which leisure occurs in a novel or predictable activity environment, not based on the activity per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…According to Melton, traveling with a partner for the first time to a destination and participating for the first time in a water-based activity (i.e., vacation A), for example, would be very different in terms of environment incongruity and amount of interaction between partners compared to regular trips to the same destination and participating in the same leisure activities (i.e., vacation B). These two balance leisure experiences (based on the CBM), while equal in frequency, “[produce] different outcomes for individual members of the family as well as the family unit as a whole” (Melton 2017, p. 460). Thus, vacation B, being low on environmental incongruity and novelty and high on partner interaction, would be expected to enhance couple cohesion more than it would enhance couple flexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars hypothesize that fundamentally different processes occur in different types of leisure. For example, familiar activities occurring in a familiar environment may be more conducive to processes such as communication (Iso-Ahola, 1980; Melton, 2017; Zabriskie & McCormick, 2001). Conversely, novel activities occurring in unfamiliar environments may divert cognitive resources from interpersonal interactions to navigating a new activity or environment (Melton, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, familiar activities occurring in a familiar environment may be more conducive to processes such as communication (Iso-Ahola, 1980; Melton, 2017; Zabriskie & McCormick, 2001). Conversely, novel activities occurring in unfamiliar environments may divert cognitive resources from interpersonal interactions to navigating a new activity or environment (Melton, 2017). Thus, some types of leisure may support sibling relationship quality by providing opportunities for bonding through communication and interaction while others may support adaptability and flexibility by creating opportunities for trying new roles (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our knowledge, no research has documented couples' frequency of engagement in leisure in various social contexts, opting to largely focus on leisure with one's partner only or leisure engaged in alone. However, the environment, including the number and make up of people present for the leisure activity, can influence the complexity and level of arousal associated with the task (Iso- Ahola, 1980;Rossman & Schlatter, 2011), and thus is an important component of recent models of couple and family leisure (Melton, 2017). Graham (2008) speculated that the types of activities commonly engaged in with close others may frequently include exciting leisure activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%