2012
DOI: 10.4064/aa155-2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familles d'équations de Thue–Mahler n'ayant que des solutions triviales

Abstract: Let K be a number field, let S be a finite set of places of K containing the archimedean places and let µ, α1, α2, α3 be non-zero elements in K. Denote by OS the ring of S-integers in K and by O × S the group of S-units. Then the set of equivalence classes (namely, up to multiplication by S-units) of the solutions (x, y, z, ε1, ε2, ε3, ε) satisfying Card{α1ε1, α2ε2, α3ε3} = 3, is finite. With the help of this last result, we exhibit, for every integer n > 2, new families of Thue-Mahler equations of degreee n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the unknowns (x, y, a) take their values in the set of elements in Z 3 such that xy = 0 and Q(αυ a ) = K. It follows from the results in [4] that the set of solutions is finite. However, the proof in [4] relies on Schmidt's subspace theorem, which is not effective. Here we give an effective upper bound for max{|x|, |y|, |a|} in terms of m, R, λ 0 and λ, by using lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the unknowns (x, y, a) take their values in the set of elements in Z 3 such that xy = 0 and Q(αυ a ) = K. It follows from the results in [4] that the set of solutions is finite. However, the proof in [4] relies on Schmidt's subspace theorem, which is not effective. Here we give an effective upper bound for max{|x|, |y|, |a|} in terms of m, R, λ 0 and λ, by using lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof we gave in § 3 relies on our result on Diophantine equations in [3], which is a consequence of Schmidt's Subspace Theorem, while the proof of Corvaja and Zannier in [2] uses directly Schmidt's fundamental result on linear forms in algebraic numbers. It is likely that an improvement of our result could be achieved by adapting the arguments of [2] -so one would expect to obtain a refinement of our conclusion which would also include the statement of Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: Comparison With a Results Of Corvaja And Zanniermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.1 is a corollary of the following theorem whose proof can be found in [3]. Proof (of Theorem 3.1).…”
Section: A Refinement Of Liouville's Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations