1980
DOI: 10.1177/002076408002600102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Families of Incest: a Collation of Clinical Impressions

Abstract: The present paper provides a collation of the impressions of clinical workers regarding families in which father-daughter incest has incurred. Responses of the workers indicate that the incestuous relationship is typically not limited to one or two sexual encounters, but the relationship can become a stable part of family life. The sexual interactions appear to parallel sexual practices in non-incestuous relationships. Daughters involved in incest are viewed as submissive, passive, fearful, whereas the fathers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequelae enumerated include: delinquincy, substance abuse, pros titution, school failure, damaged ability to form satisfactory het erosexual relationships, compulsive seeking of father substitutes, disordered hysterical character, homosexuality and poor self-con cept, and this list is by no means complete. In constructing this mosaic we have drawn on the publications of Alexander (1985), Baird et al (1982), Browning and Boatman (1977), Carper (1979), de Chesnay (1984, Cooper and Cormier (1982), Frances and Frances (1976), Giarretto (1976), Kaufman et al (1954), Herman and Hirschman (1981), James (1981), LaBarbera (1981LaBarbera ( , 1983, Lukianowitz (1967), Machotka (1967), Selby et al (1980), Shapshay and Vines (1982), Tsai and Feldman-Summers (1979), Weeks (1976), and Wells (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequelae enumerated include: delinquincy, substance abuse, pros titution, school failure, damaged ability to form satisfactory het erosexual relationships, compulsive seeking of father substitutes, disordered hysterical character, homosexuality and poor self-con cept, and this list is by no means complete. In constructing this mosaic we have drawn on the publications of Alexander (1985), Baird et al (1982), Browning and Boatman (1977), Carper (1979), de Chesnay (1984, Cooper and Cormier (1982), Frances and Frances (1976), Giarretto (1976), Kaufman et al (1954), Herman and Hirschman (1981), James (1981), LaBarbera (1981LaBarbera ( , 1983, Lukianowitz (1967), Machotka (1967), Selby et al (1980), Shapshay and Vines (1982), Tsai and Feldman-Summers (1979), Weeks (1976), and Wells (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%