1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6378(199812)23:6<416::aid-col10>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familiar objects and memory color

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another paper often cited as providing evidence of the increased saturation for remembered color is [10]. In this study participants' recollections of the color of 8 common fruit and vegetables were assessed under two illuminants and compared to measurements taken from real examples of the produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another paper often cited as providing evidence of the increased saturation for remembered color is [10]. In this study participants' recollections of the color of 8 common fruit and vegetables were assessed under two illuminants and compared to measurements taken from real examples of the produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Siple and Springer [6] confirmed the tendency for saturation increase, but reported quite accurate agreement for brightness and hue. In a study by Pérez-Carpinell, de Fez, Baldoví and Soriano [7] memory saturation only increased for high purity objects, while it decreased or remained the same for midrange or low purity objects. They also reported unsystematic hue shifts specific to the familiar object investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an object of a well-known color is illuminated in such a way that the color that it offers is quite different from the color that identifies it, the perception of its color is influenced by the color memory of the object. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] We do not need to take this into account when we work with color chips. [8][9][10][11] Hamwi and Landis, 12 Bumham and Clark, 13 Newhall et al, 8 Nilsson and Nelson,14 etc., find that successive matching shows a greater variability than simultaneous matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%