2018
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familiar Object Salience Affects Novel Word Learning

Abstract: Children use the presence of familiar objects with known names to identify the correct referents of novel words. In natural environments, objects vary widely in salience. The presence of familiar objects may sometimes hinder rather than help word learning. To test this hypothesis, 3-year-olds (N = 36) were shown novel objects paired with familiar objects that varied in their visual salience. When the novel objects were labeled, children were slower and less accurate at fixating them in the presence of highly s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that children's processing was more robust in their dominant language adds to recent literature suggesting that bilinguals' early vocabulary depends on the balance of input they receive in each language (e.g., Marchman et al, 2017;Place & Hoff, 2011). We did not find significant associations between children's vocabulary and real-time processing (see Bergelson & Swingley, 2015;Pomper & Saffran, 2018 for other examples of inconsistent relations). This result may be an artifact of parents' difficulty estimating children's knowledge in two languages (e.g., Marchman et al, 2017), may reflect that within-language estimates of vocabulary are not appropriate for capturing between-language comprehension (e.g., Place & Hoff, 2011, or may be due to limitations in the precision with which we can quantify individual infants' vocabulary and/or real-time processing abilities (e.g., Trafimow, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The fact that children's processing was more robust in their dominant language adds to recent literature suggesting that bilinguals' early vocabulary depends on the balance of input they receive in each language (e.g., Marchman et al, 2017;Place & Hoff, 2011). We did not find significant associations between children's vocabulary and real-time processing (see Bergelson & Swingley, 2015;Pomper & Saffran, 2018 for other examples of inconsistent relations). This result may be an artifact of parents' difficulty estimating children's knowledge in two languages (e.g., Marchman et al, 2017), may reflect that within-language estimates of vocabulary are not appropriate for capturing between-language comprehension (e.g., Place & Hoff, 2011, or may be due to limitations in the precision with which we can quantify individual infants' vocabulary and/or real-time processing abilities (e.g., Trafimow, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, when toddlers heard sentence frames in their non-dominant language, they successfully recognized target nouns in both languages. We did not find significant associations between children's vocabulary and real-time processing (seeBergelson & Swingley, 2015;Pomper & Saffran, 2018 for other examples of inconsistent relations). Thus, not all language switching impedes processing, and the robustness of bilingual toddlers' word knowledge influences their real-time comprehension of simple sentences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In contrast, in reaching versions of the tasks eighteen-month-old toddlers do not perform well on reference selection or retention (Kucker, McMurry & Samuelson, 2018), 24-month-olds perform well on reference selection, but they do not retain the mappings (Samuelson & Horst, 2008), and by 30 months of age children are good at both (see Kucker, McMurray, & Samuelson, 2015a for a review and discussion). Both reference selection and retention, however, can be influenced by a number of external and organismic factors (see e.g., Axelsson & Horst, 2014;Kalashnikova, Escudero & Kidd, 2018;Kucker & Samuelson, 2012;Pomper & Saffran, 2018, Twomey, Ranson, & Horst, 2013. Still other research indicates that children as young as 13 months of age can map and, in some cases, retain novel word-object mappings when only one name and one object are presented at a time (Schafer & Plunkett, 1998;Woodward, Markman, & Fitzsimmons, 1994).…”
Section: Reference Selection and Retention Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%