1970
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.7.2.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familial occurrence of congenital malformations and ring chromosome (46,XX,Cr).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonspecific findings in our patient are not helpful in this regard. Comparison of both the phenotypic and the chromosomal findings in our patient with those from the literature indicate that microcephaly and mental and physical retardation is a common pattern in these patients (Turner et al, 1962;Atkins et al, 1966;Bueno, Del Amo, and Hermida, 1969;Gacs, Schuler, and Sellyei, 1970). The lack of a common phenotype is not surprising and could be due to involvement of different C group chromosomes or alteration of different parts of the same chromosome in the formation of the ring structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The nonspecific findings in our patient are not helpful in this regard. Comparison of both the phenotypic and the chromosomal findings in our patient with those from the literature indicate that microcephaly and mental and physical retardation is a common pattern in these patients (Turner et al, 1962;Atkins et al, 1966;Bueno, Del Amo, and Hermida, 1969;Gacs, Schuler, and Sellyei, 1970). The lack of a common phenotype is not surprising and could be due to involvement of different C group chromosomes or alteration of different parts of the same chromosome in the formation of the ring structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The clinical anomalies observed in this patient were strikingly mild and included short stature, small head circumference, widely spaced nipples, and pectus excavatum. One or more of the physical anomalies have been cited by others in association with ring C chromosomes (Gacs et al, 1970;Moore et al, 1973;Zackai and Breg, 1973). However, in all instances there were additional abnormalities that were not present in our case, or the chromosome involved was not chromosome 10.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…Most reports of ring C chromosomes have not identified the specific chromosome involved, and the clinical features associated with them have been variable (Atkins et al, 1966;Gacs et al, 1970;Therkelsen et al, 1971). Moore et al (1973) and Fried et al (1975) described rings derived from chromosome 6 using quinacrine and ASG banding, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ring chromosomes are rare, they have been observed in each of the seven chromosomal groups, including at least 10 cases in the C group (Turner et al, 1962;Smith-White et al, 1963;Atkins et al, 1966/67;Butler, France, and Jacoby, 1967;Bueno, del Amo, and Hermida, 1969;Wurster et al, 1969;Gacs, Schuler, and Sellyei, 1970;Kistenmacher and Punnett, 1970;Therkelsen, M0ller, and Henningsen, 1971; de Chieri et al, 1972). None of the Cgroup chromosomes involved in the ring formation was identified.…”
Section: Summary a Clinical And Cytogeneticmentioning
confidence: 99%