2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False positives from impurities result in incorrect functional characterization of receptors in chemosensory studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of triple electroantennography reduces the risk of uneven sampling of the olfactory receptor 23,24 . Artefactual responses to impurities have been reported 45,46 , but were refuted here by the GC-EAD analysis of the same compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation

Olfaction in Tephritidae: a balance between detection and discrimination

Ramiaranjatovo,
Charlery de la Masselière,
Dekker
et al. 2024
Preprint
Self Cite
“…The use of triple electroantennography reduces the risk of uneven sampling of the olfactory receptor 23,24 . Artefactual responses to impurities have been reported 45,46 , but were refuted here by the GC-EAD analysis of the same compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Artefactual responses to impurities have been reported 45,46 , but were refuted here by the GC-EAD analysis of the same compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%

Olfaction in Tephritidae: a balance between detection and discrimination

Ramiaranjatovo,
Charlery de la Masselière,
Dekker
et al. 2024
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Another very important (but often neglected) confounding factor in odor sensation studies is the presence of impurities in the sample, which is exacerbated at very high stimulus concentrations. This has been substantially demonstrated in a study which explored the unlikely response of a food volatile-sensitive ORN of Drosophila melanogaster to the sex pheromone of female silk moths, Bombyx mori 44 . Careful chemical analyses and the use of GC coupled to SSR (GC-SSR) demonstrated that a minute (< 1%) content of plant volatiles in the moth pheromone sample was responsible of the unexpected response of D. melanogaster ORNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This unspeci c activation could falsely signal the brain the presence of non-pheromone odors which could then trigger behavioral responses that the sex pheromone at natural concentrations would never do. Furthermore, at high stimulus concentrations small impurities present in synthetic compounds may cause false positives, especially if they are more volatile than the target compound [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%