2020
DOI: 10.4103/ijmm.ijmm_20_402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-Positive Blood Cultures: The Need for Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, mycobacteria are often identified through a combination of pathogen culture and biochemical test technology in clinical practice [ 32 ]. Considering some reports of false-positive results from pathogen culture [ 33 ], an alternative to traditional laboratory microbial culture combined with biochemical test technology is difficult to identify [ 32 ]. mNGS has rapidly emerged as an advanced technique for pathogen detection that can be performed directly on clinical specimens, which is characterized by high speed, high specificity, and high throughput [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, mycobacteria are often identified through a combination of pathogen culture and biochemical test technology in clinical practice [ 32 ]. Considering some reports of false-positive results from pathogen culture [ 33 ], an alternative to traditional laboratory microbial culture combined with biochemical test technology is difficult to identify [ 32 ]. mNGS has rapidly emerged as an advanced technique for pathogen detection that can be performed directly on clinical specimens, which is characterized by high speed, high specificity, and high throughput [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%