2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-negative rate of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests and its relationship to test timing and illness severity: A case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows that while the noise has very limited effects on the number of tests required by each GT scheme, it does have the expected effect of increasing the FNR of both individual and group tests. For individual testing, the noise function we fit appears to correspond to an FNR of just under 0.05, which is comparable to the empirically determined values reported in [33] and [35]. The FNR values of both GT schemes are also consistently slightly higher than those of individual testing.…”
Section: Algorithms and Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 7 shows that while the noise has very limited effects on the number of tests required by each GT scheme, it does have the expected effect of increasing the FNR of both individual and group tests. For individual testing, the noise function we fit appears to correspond to an FNR of just under 0.05, which is comparable to the empirically determined values reported in [33] and [35]. The FNR values of both GT schemes are also consistently slightly higher than those of individual testing.…”
Section: Algorithms and Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The presence of anti-NC-positivity in individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 in HCW Group B1 who had no COVID-19 history might indicate asymptomatic infections or low viral loads. Takahashi et al [ 26 ] indicated that stage of infection can lead to false-negative PCR results due to low viral load levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to cost and time factors, serological assays that are positively associated with true antibody concentration (IgM/IgG) can be an important approach to identify asymptomatic patients by conducting epidemiological surveys. Additionally, these assays can also be used for COVID patients with negative rRT-PCR results in the later stages of infection [3,4]. Serological assays, such as lateral flow assays (LFAs) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), are valuable tools for epidemiological surveys, helping to understand the spread of the disease, the impact of containment measures, monitoring herd immunity, predicting risk, and prioritizing groups for vaccination [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%