False clouds for Internet of Things and methods of protection

Kirichek, Ruslan; Kulik, Vyacheslav; Koucheryavy, Andrey

doi:10.1109/icact.2016.7423327

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is clear that the protection system is more effective the smaller the amount of damage (5) and the larger the amount of damage prevented (10). To do this, you should increase the value of the probability i p and reduce the duration of the control procedure ki T  .…”

Section: T T  mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…that is, it is equal to the maximum possible damage due to the successful implementation of threats, which is reduced by the amount of the maximum possible damage due to an idle network during control. It also follows from expressions ( 7), (10) that it is advisable to apply network protection against threats of any type only when the value of the damage to be prevented is not negative (is greater than zero). For threats of the i-th type, this means that…”

Section: T T  mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IoT are very common for protection of information in modern telecommunication networks [10,22]. One of the most important functions of effective protection of the organization's information system is threat tracking and analysis and calculation of quantitative indicators of the functional properties of the security of content distributed in networks [1,3,5,8,9,12,19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Generalized Model of Information Protection Process in Audiovisual Content Distribution Networks

Rozorinov

Hres

Rusyn

2022

IAPGOS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most important indicators of the effectiveness of content protection systems are indicators of the achieved security level, i.e. functional properties of security. These indicators are: confidentiality, integrity, availability. Each of the indicators of the functional properties of content security is distributed according to the methods of ensuring and the degree of its achievement. A significant drawback of such indicators is that they are qualitative. This significantly narrows the scope of their use and makes it impossible to use them in mathematical expressions for optimizing the parameters of protection means, obtaining quantitative estimates of the performance quality of the protection system or its components, etc. The work offers a number of quantitative indicators, which, depending on the purpose, can be probabilistic and temporal. Calculation of such indicators makes it possible to assess the degree of ensuring the functional properties of information security or the possible degree of ensuring the functional properties of protected information.

show abstract

Section: T T  mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: T T  mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Generalized Model of Information Protection Process in Audiovisual Content Distribution Networks

Rozorinov

Hres

Rusyn

2022

IAPGOS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In articles [1] - [5] the authors consider, and below summarize the main features of identification for the Internet of Things, namely: different life cycle of devices; the relationship of the objects of the Internet of Things with other extrasystem entities; special requirements for the context in which the devices operate; requirements for providing protection mechanisms; the ability to expand the identification system to a huge number of devices; ability to work effectively for a variety of devices; transparency of the addressing system and independence from the network; flexible and efficient mechanism for identifier resolution; security and storage of user data, etc.…”

Section: Review Of Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Technical Solutions for Identification of Internet Things in Modern Communication Networks

Vyshnivskyi

Sribna

Zinchenko

2021

ECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the current state of development of the Internet of Things and the principles of their identification; analysis of technical solutions for identification of the Internet of Things in modern communication networks; the parameters of quality of service and identification of devices and applications of the Internet of Things are investigated, and also the perspective method of construction of network architecture IoT with intermediate level of interaction which differs from known that allows to reduce network delay at exchange of service messages between local and global registers of system is investigated. Based on the obtained delay values, we can conclude that in order to minimize the delay, it is necessary to optimize the routes for accessing GHR servers. Considering the differences between the main components of the identification system, it is worth noting the combination of Global Handle Register and Local Handle Register in one object for testing. In the long run, this makes it possible to evaluate the multiple characteristics of the system at the application level. The resulting system in stationary execution also allows you to clearly demonstrate the speed of the identification rate, the route of service traffic and other parameters.

show abstract