Abstract:Fall defoliation was followed by a depletion of carbohydrate (CHO) reserves and reduction or prevention of yield if defoliation occurred prior to November 1. Refoliation of August-defoliated trees restored the depleted reserves in current season’s wood tissues by December 1 but either completely prevented or greatly reduced yield the next year. September defoliation caused the greatest depletion of reserves and prevented pistillate or staminate flower production the next year. Defoliation on November 1 had no … Show more
“…Ethephon at 3-12 m M was used to induce nearly 100% shuck dehiscence 3 to 6 weeks earlier than normally observed, but also induced high levels of leaf abscission. This effect precludes its use alone as a harvest aid for pecan, because defoliation prior to 1 Nov. will greatly reduce the next year's yield (17) due to the loss of carbohydrates and other assimilates (18). The degree of leaf loss necessary to induce a significant loss to the following year's yield or nut quality is currently unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is supported by observations that shucks of fruit with a dead or abnormal kernel generally do not dehisce (unpublished observation) and dehiscence of normal fruit can be accelerated by exogenously applied ethylene (4). Field attempts to accelerate dehiscence and advance harvesting by using ethylene-releasing chemicals have been unacceptable due to subsequent leaflet abscission (5,13) and its adverse effect on alternate bearing (12,17,18).The threshold for the dehiscence response is 0.7 ppm less for exogenous ethylene near the time of fruit maturity than is the leaflet abscission process (6). Thus, use of ethylene-releasing chemicals by pecan growers must be preceded or accompanied by chemicals that prevent or retard leaflet abscission, while not interfering with shuck dehiscence.…”
Field observations indicate that conjunctive use of ethephon (Ethrel) and NAA (Fruitone-N) can induce early pecan [Carya illinoensis (Wangenh.) C. Koch] shuck (involucre) dehiscence, while greatly reducing undesirable leaflet abscission. Comparisons of the efficacy of 2,4-D and NAA in preventing undesirable leaflet abscission revealed that the comparative molar protective activity of 2,4-D greatly exceeds that of NAA, providing leaflets absolute protection against ethephon-induced abscission, but it was functionally inferior to NAA due to the induction of leaflet necrosis. Single ethephon treatments accelerated shuck dehiscence 3 to 6 weeks for several cultivars. Treatment of ‘Stuart’ and ‘Moneymaker’ pecan fruit and foliage, several weeks prior to the completion of natural shuck dehiscence, with a NAA-ethephon mixture accelerated shuck dehiscence by 5 and 3 weeks, respectively, without severe leaflet abscission or loss of nut quality. These data indicate possible development of harvest-aid technology for early harvesting of pecan without severe leaflet abscission. Chemical names used: (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon); (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D); and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
“…Ethephon at 3-12 m M was used to induce nearly 100% shuck dehiscence 3 to 6 weeks earlier than normally observed, but also induced high levels of leaf abscission. This effect precludes its use alone as a harvest aid for pecan, because defoliation prior to 1 Nov. will greatly reduce the next year's yield (17) due to the loss of carbohydrates and other assimilates (18). The degree of leaf loss necessary to induce a significant loss to the following year's yield or nut quality is currently unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is supported by observations that shucks of fruit with a dead or abnormal kernel generally do not dehisce (unpublished observation) and dehiscence of normal fruit can be accelerated by exogenously applied ethylene (4). Field attempts to accelerate dehiscence and advance harvesting by using ethylene-releasing chemicals have been unacceptable due to subsequent leaflet abscission (5,13) and its adverse effect on alternate bearing (12,17,18).The threshold for the dehiscence response is 0.7 ppm less for exogenous ethylene near the time of fruit maturity than is the leaflet abscission process (6). Thus, use of ethylene-releasing chemicals by pecan growers must be preceded or accompanied by chemicals that prevent or retard leaflet abscission, while not interfering with shuck dehiscence.…”
Field observations indicate that conjunctive use of ethephon (Ethrel) and NAA (Fruitone-N) can induce early pecan [Carya illinoensis (Wangenh.) C. Koch] shuck (involucre) dehiscence, while greatly reducing undesirable leaflet abscission. Comparisons of the efficacy of 2,4-D and NAA in preventing undesirable leaflet abscission revealed that the comparative molar protective activity of 2,4-D greatly exceeds that of NAA, providing leaflets absolute protection against ethephon-induced abscission, but it was functionally inferior to NAA due to the induction of leaflet necrosis. Single ethephon treatments accelerated shuck dehiscence 3 to 6 weeks for several cultivars. Treatment of ‘Stuart’ and ‘Moneymaker’ pecan fruit and foliage, several weeks prior to the completion of natural shuck dehiscence, with a NAA-ethephon mixture accelerated shuck dehiscence by 5 and 3 weeks, respectively, without severe leaflet abscission or loss of nut quality. These data indicate possible development of harvest-aid technology for early harvesting of pecan without severe leaflet abscission. Chemical names used: (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon); (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D); and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
“…The influence of sink demand on photosyn-thetic and senescence physiology of pecan appears to be an important component of the tree's growth strategy, which directly influences next years' nut crop. Studies have shown that autumn defoliation or heavy pest infestations can reduce or prevent fruit-set the following year (8,26,27), presumably due to limited assimilate reserves. Such factors are especially important to trees producing a heavy nut crop, since the time between the conclusion of kernel filling and leaf drop is critical to the accumulation of assimilates necessary for the next seasons' crop.…”
Section: O L J I____________ I____________i____________ I____________imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternate bearing is a phenomenon nearly ubiquitous to polycarpic trees (18) and is a problem of primary importance to the pecan industry. The casual mechanism is unknown, but is closely linked to tree assimilate reserves (26,27). Trees entering dormancy with low reserves tend to produce weak growth and/ or light (" off" ) crops the following year.…”
Seasonal measurements of net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (Cs), and endogenous senescence-related chemicals were made on pecan [Carya illinoensis (Wang.) C. Koch] trees growing in the orchard environment. Leaves from terminal shoots of mature, 75-year-old ‘Moneymaker’ trees in the “on” alternately bearing phase maintained 10% to 40% higher Pn rates than did those of “off” phase trees. These “on” leaves also maintained higher levels of chlorophyll, protein, amino acids, and RNA, but less K. than “off” leaves. The presence of developing fruit suppressed the rate of late summer and autumnal leaf senescence, with “on” trees retaining their leaves in a higher state of vigor than those of “off” trees. Pn and Cs rates between leaflets of adjacent fruiting and nonfruiting shoots of 7-year-old ‘Desirable’ trees were also 10% to 15% higher for the fruiting shoots throughout the season. Pn and Cs rates were influenced such that gas exchange of leaves increased as sink demand increased. These data provide evidence that this sink-demand associated stimulus operates in a localized rather than a generalized manner and that it retards the rate of leaf senescence.
“…Irregular bearing severely limits production of pecan nuts. Correlation of production with carbohydrate reserves indicates that low levels of carbohydrates prevent or reduce nut yield the following year (18,19,25,26). This reduction is attributed partially to rapid dry weight accumulation (24) and to energy utilization associated with kernel filling in the latter part of the growing season (18).…”
Pecan [Carya illinoinensis) (Wangenh.) K. Koch] kernel development was characterized by an initial rapid localized expansion of testa and endosperm, which was closely associated with low levels of free and bound abscisic acid (ABA) and with high levels of gibberllin-like (GL) substances. Rapid cotyledon growth began with the termination of testa and endosperm expansion, which was subsequent to a sharp increase in both free and bound ABA. The rate of change for growth in kernel dry weight was highly correlated with the rate of change in levels of both free ABA (R2 = 0.86) and bound ABA (R2 = 0.88). Levels of GL substances (ng/g kernel), as measured by the dwarf pea and cucumber bioassays, were relatively low after the rapid accumulation of kernel dry weight, however, GL substances detected by the barley endosperm bioassay were high during the last 30 days of kernel development. Abscisic acid and GL substances seem to exercise a significant role in seed development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.