Falibilismo como perspectiva educacional no cenário das sociedades complexas e plurais

Possibilidades De Avaliação Epistemológica Dos Programas De Pós-Graduação Em Enfermagem À Luz De Karl Popper

“…For this thought, one cannot know the phenomena of the world, either by its constant transformation, or by the limitation of the sensory organs, notably sight and hearing, or methods and theories. 11,[13][14] Fallibilism appears as an intermediate attitude to these two epistemological positions. Opposing dogmatism, this position admits that scientific knowledge is fallible, subject to errors and revisions; soon, in permanent construction.…”

“…Against skepticism, fallibilism argues that scientific knowledge is possible, because it advances by allowing the human being to interact with the world, both by regularity and by the capacity for change. [11][12][13] Karl Popper (1902Popper ( -1994) is a fallibilism in the scientific area. For him, scientific knowledge does not have the value of truth, but of verisimilitude.…”

“…The criterion of scientific demarcation assumed by Popper is that the statement is scientific if and only if it is liable to empirical falsification. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Thus, there is only one fundamental condition for any hypothesis to have the status of scientific theory: the hypothesis must be falsifiable. It is the fact that a scientific theory can be theoretically falsifiable that determines its scientificity.…”

“…The theorist aimed to explain the rationality of science without appealing to induction. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] For the theorist, 1) "[...] there is no logical entity called inductive inference"; 15:103 2) "[...] induction does not exist"; 15:104 3) "[...] a principle of induction is superfluous". 17:29 Affirmation 1 consists of the Popperian thesis that induction is invalid from the logical point of view.…”

“…Such a position is the motive of the criticism of the theoretician, because for him, instead of constructing and assuming this dogmatic position, science should be concerned with constructing hypotheses that should be tested by the scientific exercise itself. [13][14][15][16][17] Popper's alternative to inductivism -the…”