2003
DOI: 10.5771/0934-9200-2003-4-146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fakten zur Überbelegung im Strafvollzug und Wege zur Reduzierung von Gefangenenraten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another way may be the shaping of alternatives to prison sentences. According to some federal states, extending the programmes of charitable work under the guidance of the penitentiary system could lead to an explicit relaxation of overcrowding in prisons (Dü nkel & Geng 2003). Using charitable work as a default and resorting to imprisonment only when such work is not accepted should also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another way may be the shaping of alternatives to prison sentences. According to some federal states, extending the programmes of charitable work under the guidance of the penitentiary system could lead to an explicit relaxation of overcrowding in prisons (Dü nkel & Geng 2003). Using charitable work as a default and resorting to imprisonment only when such work is not accepted should also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of increasing the number of cells and expanding the prison system as done by countries like the USA, England or the Netherlands, German lawyers, jurists, psychiatrists and criminologists call for specific measures to shorten or even avoid imprisonment. For example, the Scandinavian countries were able to significantly reduce their imprisonment rates (Dü nkel & Geng 2003). The model appears to be a winÁwin strategy: on the one hand, it greatly reduces the maintenance costs; on the other hand, the extreme interference with the private and social life of the offender, as well as the psychosocial consequential losses for the imprisoned and his relatives, are minimized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%