Faking Resistance of a Quasi-ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory without Algebraic Dependence

Salgado, Jesús F.; Lado, Mario

doi:10.5093/jwop2018a23

Cited by 55 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding could be explained by the type of response format used in the personality inventory QI5F/Tri [49]. As previously described, the QI5F/Tri is a quasi-ipsative forced-choice test, a type of measure that has proven to be faking resistant when compared to single-stimulus measures [27,77,78]. Empirical evidence has shown that quasi-ipsative forced-choice inventories have the same or greater predictive validity than normative, ipsative, and single stimulus tests regarding occupational and academic performance (see [22,25,26]).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, recent meta-analytic research carried out in the educational and organizational domains showed that the type of personality questionnaire was a relevant moderator of the capacity of the big five personality factors to predict academic and occupational outcomes [12,[24][25][26][27]. The bulk of the research was conducted using single stimulus (SS) inventories (i.e., NEO-PI-R) and no studies were done using forced-choice (FC) quasi-ipsative personality inventories.…”

Section: Personality and Academic Dishonesty (Ad)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The bulk of the research was conducted using single stimulus (SS) inventories (i.e., NEO-PI-R) and no studies were done using forced-choice (FC) quasi-ipsative personality inventories. However, it is well established that: (1) FC quasi-ipsative inventories show larger validity for predicting GPA and job performance than SS inventories [26]; (2) SS inventories are affected by faking and social desirable response biases (i.e., [8,28,29]); and (3) FC personality inventories are robust against faking [27,30,31]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study [19] has partially examined the relationship between the big five and AD using a FC quasi-ipsative inventory.…”

Section: Personality and Academic Dishonesty (Ad)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic dishonesty (AD) is a problem that affects all higher education institutions. It hurts their reputation, undermines integrity programs, and sidelines sustainability efforts. To understand its negative impact, the empirical study of AD is a critical issue. Up to now, the majority of research on AD has taken place in the North American context. The current research analyzes the prevalence of AD in a non-American university and, focusing on individual differences, examines some of its causes and consequences. The results prove that: (1) AD is a problem that occurs frequently among students; (2) three dimensions of the big five personality model correlate with AD. These are conscientiousness (ρ = −0.49, p < 0.01), extraversion (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.01), and agreeableness (ρ = −0.14, p < 0.01); (3) AD is associated to students’ GPA (Grade Point Average) (ρ = −0.34, p < 0.01) and contextual performance (ρ = −0.50, p < 0.01); (4) personality accounts for 30% of AD variance (R = 0.55, p < 0.01); and (5) AD and some of the studied individual differences explain 38% and 41% of GPA and contextual performance variance (R = 0.62, p < 0.01 and R = 0.64, p < 0.01). Implications for research and practice are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Personality and Academic Dishonesty (Ad)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Personality and Academic Dishonesty (Ad)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Palabras clave: Cuestionarios de elección forzosa Invarianza IRT Test de razón de verosimilitudes MUPP-2PL individual rankings. These effects are, of course, especially relevant in the domain of personnel selection, as they affect hiring decisions negatively (Salgado & Lado, 2018).…”

Section: El Viaje Desde Los Cuestionarios Likert a Los Cuestionarios mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Journey from Likert to Forced-Choice Questionnaires: Evidence of the Invariance of Item Parameters

Morillo¹,

Abad

Leenen

et al. 2019

Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, the correlations between the IP/ 5F and the NEO-FFI were found to be .70, .88, .55, .55, and .58 for emotional stability, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, respectively. Salgado, Moscoso, and Lado [37] also found that the correlations between the HPI and IP/5F were .75 for emotional stability, .69 and .74 for extraversion (HPI divides this dimension into two subfactors), .85 for openness to experience, .51 for agreeableness, and .67 for conscientiousness.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 88%

Individual differences and counterproductive academic behaviors in high school

Cuadrado¹,

Salgado²,

Moscoso³

2020

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Counterproductive academic behaviors (CAB) is a problem that has plagued academic institutions for centuries. However, research has mostly been focused on higher learning institutes in North America. For this reason, literature on CAB must be expanded to other geographical areas and academic levels. The present research analyses the prevalence and correlates of CAB in a sample of Spanish high school students. The results indicate that CAB is a common phenomenon, cheating and low effort behaviors being the most prevalent forms. Correlational analyses revealed that conscientiousness (ρ =-.55, p < .01), emotional stability (ρ = .28, p < .01), and agreeableness (ρ =-.26, p < .05) are predictors of CAB. Multiple regression analyses showed that conscientiousness is the dimension exerting the strongest impact on CAB (β =-.64, p < .01), followed by agreeableness, and emotional stability. These three dimensions accounted for 51% of CAB variance. Last, implications for theory and practice are described.

show abstract

Faking Resistance of a Quasi-ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory without Algebraic Dependence

Cited by 55 publications

References 16 publications

Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University

Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University

The Journey from Likert to Forced-Choice Questionnaires: Evidence of the Invariance of Item Parameters

Individual differences and counterproductive academic behaviors in high school

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About