Big Data: Learning, Analytics, and Applications 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2521250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fake news identification: a comparison of parts-of-speech and N-grams with neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from word-based features such as n-grams, syntactic features such as POS tags are also exploited to capture linguistic characteristics of texts. Stoick, Snell & Straub (2019) stated that previous linguistic work suggests part-of-speech and n-gram frequencies are often different between fake and real articles. He created two models and concluded that some aspects of the fake articles remained readily identifiable, even when the classifier was trained on a limited number of examples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from word-based features such as n-grams, syntactic features such as POS tags are also exploited to capture linguistic characteristics of texts. Stoick, Snell & Straub (2019) stated that previous linguistic work suggests part-of-speech and n-gram frequencies are often different between fake and real articles. He created two models and concluded that some aspects of the fake articles remained readily identifiable, even when the classifier was trained on a limited number of examples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tool are POS Tags, assigning individual words to Parts-of-speech and returning their percentage share in the document [42]. The basic information about the grammar of the text and the presumed emotions of the author obtained in this way are supplemented with the knowledge acquired from SlangNet [43], Colloquial WordNet [44], SentiWordNet [45] and SentiStrength [46], returning, in turn, information about slang and colloquial expressions, indicating the author's sentiment and defining it as positive or negative.…”
Section: Psycholinguistic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group worked on extending a facial feature steganography technique that was previously proposed by Marella, Straub and Bernard [31]. A second group worked on creating a user interface for cybersecurity command decision making while a third group looked into deceptive content identification, based on prior work [32]- [34]. It is likely that at least one of the research option groups will end up publishing a conference paper on their work.…”
Section: Immersion Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%