Fake News and the Convention on Cybercrime

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the recent term of the United States President, Donald Trump, brought the term “fake news” to the attention of the broader community. Some jurisdictions have developed anti-fake news legislation, whilst others have used existing cybercrime legislation. A significant deficiency is the lack of a clear definition of fake news. Just because a person calls something “fake news” does not mean that it is indeed false. Especially during pandemics, the primary aim should be to have misinformation and disinformation removed quickly from the web rather than prosecute offenders. The most widely accepted international anti-cybercrime treaty is the Convention on Cybercrime developed by the Council of Europe, which is silent on fake news, the propagation of which may be a cybercrime. There is an Additional Protocol that deals with hate speech, which the authors consider to be a subset of fake news. Using examples from Southeast Asia, the paper develops a comprehensive definition of what constitutes fake news. It ensures that it covers the various flavours of fake news that have been adopted in various jurisdictions. Hate speech can be considered a subset of fake news and is defined as the publication or distribution of fake news with the intention to incite hatred or violence against ethnic, religious, political, and other groups in society. The paper proposes some offences, including those that should be applied to platform service providers. The recommendations could be easily adapted for inclusion in the Convention on Cybercrime or other regional conventions. Such an approach is desirable as cybercrime, including propagating fake news, is not a respecter of national borders, and has widespread deleterious effects. Keywords: Fake news; hate speech; Convention on Cybercrime; draft legislation

A tale of two pandemics: Fake news and COVID-19

“…Wardle (2017) developed a seven stage matrix of fake news. It was further refined by (Smith & Perry, 2021) based on the earlier work of Smith (2020). In summary, fake news must meet three criteria: the material must be deliberately published or distributed; the material must contain disinformation or misinformation; and finally, it must be misleading by design (Smith & Perry, 2021, p. 346).…”

‘Fake News’ in Asean: Legislative Responses

“…False context -genuine content is shared with false contextual information; and g) Manipulated content -genuine information or imagery is manipulated to deceive. Smith and Perry (2021) propose a modification of Wardle's (2017) matrix in their suggestion to define the crime of spreading fake news. They recommend that satire or parody are not a crime.…”