2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faithful compact quantum group actions on connected compact metrizable spaces

Abstract: We construct faithful actions of quantum permutation groups on connected compact metrizable spaces. This disproves a conjecture of Goswami.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, we will be interested in computing the quantum isometry groups of its various half-liberations. Our approach here will be based on the affine quantum isometry group formalism [11], [13], [15], [16], with various technical ingredients from [1], [6], [10], [17]. We will prove that the affine quantum isometry groups of the 6 half-liberated spheres are as follows: In other words, our result will state that, for the sphere X = S N −1 C itself, the quantum isometry groups of the half-liberations are the half-liberations of the usual isometry group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we will be interested in computing the quantum isometry groups of its various half-liberations. Our approach here will be based on the affine quantum isometry group formalism [11], [13], [15], [16], with various technical ingredients from [1], [6], [10], [17]. We will prove that the affine quantum isometry groups of the 6 half-liberated spheres are as follows: In other words, our result will state that, for the sphere X = S N −1 C itself, the quantum isometry groups of the half-liberations are the half-liberations of the usual isometry group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we get from [13] an action of S + n on C(T ) which is clearly isometric in our sense, hence (by the universality of Q) a surjective CQG morphism in the reverse direction. In other words,…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…shown in the figures below. These are particular types of examples considered in [13] (see also [9]). …”
Section: Computation Of Qiso(x D) For a Class Of Metric Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations