2020
DOI: 10.1145/3386296.3386304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairness issues in AI systems that augment sensory abilities

Abstract: Systems that augment sensory abilities are increasingly employing AI and machine learning (ML) approaches, with applications ranging from object recognition and scene description tools for blind users to sound awareness tools for d/Deaf users. However, unlike many other AI-enabled technologies, these systems provide information that is already available to non-disabled people. In this paper, we discuss unique AI fairness challenges that arise in this context, including accessibility issues with data and models… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the intention to provide 'equal' access to information raises the question of fairness in the context of assistive technologies. Prior works discussed AI-related fairness challenges in the context of accessibility and the ethical implications to decide what information AI should provide to users [34,42,55,97]. Findlater et al focused on balancing the privacy concerns of the primary users and others raised by sensory augmentation.…”
Section: Fairness and Equity In Information Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the intention to provide 'equal' access to information raises the question of fairness in the context of assistive technologies. Prior works discussed AI-related fairness challenges in the context of accessibility and the ethical implications to decide what information AI should provide to users [34,42,55,97]. Findlater et al focused on balancing the privacy concerns of the primary users and others raised by sensory augmentation.…”
Section: Fairness and Equity In Information Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamidi et al reported how identifying gender through facial features can challenge the autonomy of transgender people and reinforce gender binary attitudes [67]. Furthermore, their use can adversely afect marginalized populations (such as people of color and transgender people) [42,55,77,105,125] by increasing inequality [102]. In the context of algorithmic errors, prior work has also highlighted how facial recognition systems are incorporated within systems of policing and surveillance where misclassiications can create signiicant problems (e.g., if the algorithm wrongfully identiies someone as a suspect) [14,68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is a type of AI that provides machines with the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed [8]. Machine learning technology leverages advances [9] in computer vision, speech recognition, and auditory scene analysis to sense, interpret, and offer new ways to help people with disabilities. The taxonomy of the machine learning accessibility tools for people with disabilities (visually, hearing, and physically impaired) is illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Machine Learning For People With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the feld of accessibility, human-centered ML applications can allow disabled users to personalize data-driven assistive technology to meet their individual needs [40]. However, training an ML-enabled application as a personal assistive technology can itself be inaccessible when it requires skills and abilities similar to those the application is intended to support [23,40]. For example, a blind or visually impaired user is likely unable to use visual feedback when capturing images for personalizing an object recognizer-a challenge that Kacorri et al and others (e.g., [41,69]) frst examined via studies of users' needs in this context, and more recently began addressing through active feedback techniques to assist in image capture [49].…”
Section: Human-centered Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%