2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2017.8108680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairness Comparison of Uplink NOMA and OMA

Abstract: In this paper, we compare the resource allocation fairness of uplink communications between non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) schemes and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) schemes. Through characterizing the contribution of the individual user data rate to the system sum rate, we analyze the fundamental reasons that NOMA offers a more fair resource allocation than that of OMA in asymmetric channels. Furthermore, a fairness indicator metric based on Jain's index is proposed to measure the asymmetry of multiu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the single-BS-antenna case (N = 1) with α 1 = 0.35 under our setup, the OMA-based partial offloading scheme is observed to achieve the same energy-saving performance as the NOMA-based counterpart. This is consistent with the fact that in the single-antenna scenario, the OMA transmission is able to achieve one point at the Pareto boundary of the capacity region for the multiple access channel (that is achievable by NOMA) in a time-sharing manner [30]. Under our setup, this point is achieved by the two users time-sharing the offloading wireless channel with portions α 1 = 0.35 and α 2 = 1 − α 1 = 0.65, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Note that in the single-BS-antenna case (N = 1) with α 1 = 0.35 under our setup, the OMA-based partial offloading scheme is observed to achieve the same energy-saving performance as the NOMA-based counterpart. This is consistent with the fact that in the single-antenna scenario, the OMA transmission is able to achieve one point at the Pareto boundary of the capacity region for the multiple access channel (that is achievable by NOMA) in a time-sharing manner [30]. Under our setup, this point is achieved by the two users time-sharing the offloading wireless channel with portions α 1 = 0.35 and α 2 = 1 − α 1 = 0.65, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1. The cell is modeled by a pair of two concentric ring- 1 We restrict ourselves to the uplink NOMA communications [49], as advanced signal detection/decoding algorithms of NOMA are more affordable at the base station. shaped discs.…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research aimed to compare the uplink (UL) NOMA system with OMA using resource allocation fairness as a reference and considering only Jain's index was reported in Reference . The authors analyzed fairness for only two users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%