2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19778-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FairGRAPE: Fairness-Aware GRAdient Pruning mEthod for Face Attribute Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, SOS-SE is competitive with recent approaches (e.g. FairGRAPE [11] achieving 90.90%) involving heavy transformer architectures (such as [12] 91.93%). It is also better than baselines CNN8-MT and CNN18-MT (whose architecture mimics VGG19) models trained from scratch on CelebA.…”
Section: B Large-scale Experiments: Application To Facial Attributes ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, SOS-SE is competitive with recent approaches (e.g. FairGRAPE [11] achieving 90.90%) involving heavy transformer architectures (such as [12] 91.93%). It is also better than baselines CNN8-MT and CNN18-MT (whose architecture mimics VGG19) models trained from scratch on CelebA.…”
Section: B Large-scale Experiments: Application To Facial Attributes ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We classify whether the dermatological condition in each picture is either benign/non-neoplastic or malignant and we use skin tone as the protected attribute, The dataset provides also annotations for gender and age groups. We adopt the same setup of [83]: gender as sensitive attribute, multi-class race as target.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By exploiting the FairFace dataset we can instead study the multi-class target case. Specifically, we considered gender as binary sensitive attribute and multi-class race as target, following the same setup [83]. The obtained results are shown in Table 5 with the EO metrics calculated according to the definition in [91].…”
Section: B Multi-class Sensitive Attributes and Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the same training and testing protocols as in [55]. Similar to [55] we reported results on the standard deviation between the performance on the protected groups, referred to as ρ(A).…”
Section: Training the Face Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the same training and testing protocols as in [55]. Similar to [55] we reported results on the standard deviation between the performance on the protected groups, referred to as ρ(A). In addition to the accuracy difference metric, this helps us quantitatively access the biases present in the model.…”
Section: Training the Face Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%