Faire face à des questions de travail : les leviers mobilisés par des éleveurs laitiers

Hostiou, Nathalie; Chauvat, Sophie; Cournut, Sylvie

doi:10.1051/978-2-7598-1192-2.c008

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For Central and Eastern Europe, Verhees et al [15] showed that land was the most important factor in developing a specific farming strategy. In France, Hostiou et al [26] observed that intensified farms with higher technology equipment sometimes employed more workers, and were the farms with significantly higher agricultural area, percentage of corn silage, number of cows and milk quota. In the Netherlands, Samson et al [36] showed that production intensity, number of cows, modernity of technology and availability of land were important factors in DP increase strategies.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers’ perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of “unhappy” producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Des études françaises soulignent également l'importance du temps d'astreinte (deux fois le temps de travail), qui pèserait surtout sur les éleveurs travaillant seuls. Le temps de travail varie cependant beaucoup selon l'orientation de l'élevage, ses équipements, la main-d'oeuvre, la localisation de l'exploitation et la rationalité privilégiée par l'éleveur (Hostiou et al, 2014). Que les systèmes soient mixtes ou spécialisés ne différencie pas le temps de travail.…”

Section: ❚ ❚ Une Compétitivité « Hors Coûts » Valorisant La Qualité Eunclassified

Impacts et services issus des élevages européens

Dumont¹,

Dupraz²,

Donnars³

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le Code de la propriété intellectuelle interdit la photocopie à usage collectif sans autorisation des ayants droit. Le non-respect de cette disposition met en danger l'édition, notamment scientifique, et est sanctionné pénalement. Toute reproduction, même partielle, du présent ouvrage est interdite sans autorisation du Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20 rue des Grands-Augustins, Paris 6 e. Cet ouvrage est issu d'une expertise scientifique collective conduite par la Délégation à l'expertise scientifique collective, à la prospective et aux études de l'Inra. Cette expertise a été commandée conjointement par les ministères en charge de l'Environnement et de l'Agriculture et par l'Ademe. Le rapport d'expertise a été élaboré par un collectif de 26 experts scientifiques sans condition d'approbation préalable par les commanditaires ou l'Inra. Les résultats relatifs à cette expertise sont disponibles sur le site Web de l'Inra : http://institut.inra.fr/Missions/Eclairer-les-decisions/Expertises/Toutes-les-actualites/ Roles-impacts-et-services-issus-des-elevages-europeens#.

show abstract

“…For Central and Eastern Europe, Verhees et al (2018) [13] showed that land was the most important factor in developing a specific farming strategy. In France, Hostiou et al (2015) [21] observed that intensified farms with higher technology equipment sometimes employed more workers, and were the farms with significantly higher agricultural area, percentage of corn silage, number of cows and milk quota. In the Netherlands, Samson et al (2016) [14] showed that production intensity, number of cows, modernity of technology and availability of land were important factors in DP increase strategies.…”

Section: Production Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do dairy farmers wish their future farm?

Dalcq

Dogot

Beckers

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers’ perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production). Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of qualitative variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies for IFF characteristic and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of “unhappy” producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.

show abstract

Faire face à des questions de travail : les leviers mobilisés par des éleveurs laitiers

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm

The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm

Impacts et services issus des élevages européens

How do dairy farmers wish their future farm?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About