The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009 Conference Record of the Forty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2009.5469857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair user selection for zero-forcing precoding in multi-user MISO systems

Abstract: Abstract-We analyze a multi-user MISO system employing zero-forcing precoding and user scheduling with an adjustable amount of fairness at the transmitter. The system shows a significant gain in sum-rate from multi-user diversity, even for a small number of users. Furthermore, a large fraction of this gain is attained even if the system is constraint to be as fair as the Round-Robin scheduler. The performance of the fair scheduler shows to be unaffected by partial channel state information at the transmitter i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, selecting users opportunistically to maximize sum-rate will result in unequal rates provided to a single user. This leads us to apply user scheduling under a fairness constraint [122]. However, fairness is not the only issue.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, selecting users opportunistically to maximize sum-rate will result in unequal rates provided to a single user. This leads us to apply user scheduling under a fairness constraint [122]. However, fairness is not the only issue.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, selecting users opportunistically to maximize sum-rate will result in unequal rates provided to a single user. This leads us to apply user scheduling under a fairness constraint [122]. However, fairness is not the only issue.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%