Fair to Swear? Gendered Formulations of Fairness in Football in Turkey

Nuhrat, Yağmur

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46870-5_7

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The system met extensive resistance by fans with boycotts and lawsuits on the grounds that it commodified fandom, rendered individual fans trackable, and made disciplinary action possible, not least in cases of anti-government protest (Erturan-Ogut, 2020; Irak, 2019). Masculinity of football fandom (Jones, 2008) also remains an issue in Turkish football, as women fans struggle with the male-dominated environment (Erhart, 2013; Nuhrat, 2017).…”

Section: Football Fandom In Turkeymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our participants, too, underlined their community as a unique fandom group in the following three respects: First is the non-hooligan and non-sexist attitude the Eagles promote by both their events and mixed-gender composition. In contrast, participants characterized off-campus BJK fans with sexism, excessive drinking and vandalism (see Erhart, 2013; Nuhrat, 2017). Identification with, and pressure from, progressive student groups in campus seem to be influential in the Eagles’ adopting such an identity, too.…”

Section: The Community and Its Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Autonomy or loyalty? Community-within-community interactions of a local football fandom group

Kaygan

2021

Journal of Consumer Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fandom communities adopt diverse consumption practices to cope with an overwhelmingly commodified football. Drawing upon literature on consumer communities, this paper examines a local football fandom community in multifarious relations with its broader fandom through divergent consumption practices, which create tensions and ambivalences in terms of the former’s autonomy from and loyalty to the latter. Based on observations and interviews with community members, the paper describes how the community’s production and consumption of its own products are experienced as matters of autonomy within and difference from broader communities, whilst the consumption of merchandise is regulated and performed as expression of loyalty to broader fandom. Findings demonstrate how a community can use multiple consumption practices to manage, mitigate and sustain its community-within-community tensions.

show abstract

Section: Football Fandom In Turkeymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Community and Its Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autonomy or loyalty? Community-within-community interactions of a local football fandom group

Kaygan

2021

Journal of Consumer Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bu dönüşümü tetikleyen, hızlandıran çeşitli etkenler var. Bir taraftan, futbolun "temizlenme," "arınma" süreci stadyumları, erişim rotalarını etkiledi ve "kadınlı" (buradan hareketle de) "aileli" futbolu övdü, hatta tepeden inme biçimde dayattı (Armstrong ve Young, 1997;Nuhrat, 2017). Bir taraftan dördüncü dalga feminizm olarak da tabir edilen ve queer hareketin de etkisiyle cinsiyet geçişkenliği, beden Futbol taraftarlığının bir özelliği otantikliğinin, yoğunluğunun ve derinliğinin sürekli altının çizilmesi, bu sayede de sürekli kanıtlanan, pekişerek yeniden inşa edilen bir şey olmasıdır (Nuhrat, 2018;Bora, 2006;Magazine, 2007).…”

Section: Cinsiyetunclassified

Sosyal Ve Kültürel Antropoloji̇de Özdüşünümselli̇k: Sahadan Örnekler

Nuhrat

2020

Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu yazı 1970'lerde temellenen ve 1980'lerde belirgin biçimde vurgulanan "özdüşünümsellik" (selfreflexivity) sorunsalına odaklanıyor. Özdüşünümselliği, antropoloji bilimini tanımlayan özelliklerden biri olan devamlı kendini eleştirme ve sorgulama pratikleri çerçevesinde ele alıyorum. Yirminci yüzyılın başında saha çalışması, kültürel görelilik, dil öğrenme gibi konuları vurgulayan sosyal ve kültürel antropoloji, yüzyılın ortasından sonra doğrudan bilgi toplama ve üretme süreçlerindeki temsil ve iktidar meselesini ele almış, hem sömürgecilikle el ele giden tarihini hem de sonrasında gelen "nesnel gözlemci" varsayımların ortaya koyduğu etnografik yöntem ve kuramlarını yeniden düşünmüştür.Özdüşünümsellik, yani antropoloğun bir nesnellik hedef ya da kaygısı gütmekten ziyade, kendi öznelliğinin ve onun getirdiği sorumluluğun farkında olması, bu sayede de kendi kendisinin verisi olma bileşenlerini okuyucuya aktarma hali, bugün antropolojinin süregelen öz eleştirisinin önemli bir aracıdır.Futbol ve trafik üzerine olan iki saha çalışmamdan yola çıkarak, kendi cinsiyet ve sınıf öznelliğimin sorunsal kurma, araştırma sorusu üretme, veri toplama ve bulgu incelemesi aşamalarındaki etkinliğini tahlil ediyorum.

show abstract

“…7 16-19 For example, the narrow definition of fairness in ML discourses does not fully engage with fairness as an idiom, or a mode of expression used to resolve public debates and emotional tensions that emerge alongside questions about what it means to build a good and just society. [20][21][22][23] Nor do these techniques or procedures fully address debates about who should/will benefit the most from these advances and why. 19 [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Finally, it remains unclear how or which notions of fairness might be used to advance health equity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualising fairness: three pillars for medical algorithms and health equity

Sikstrom

Maslej

Hui

et al. 2022

BMJ Health Care Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesFairness is a core concept meant to grapple with different forms of discrimination and bias that emerge with advances in Artificial Intelligence (eg, machine learning, ML). Yet, claims to fairness in ML discourses are often vague and contradictory. The response to these issues within the scientific community has been technocratic. Studies either measure (mathematically) competing definitions of fairness, and/or recommend a range of governance tools (eg, fairness checklists or guiding principles). To advance efforts to operationalise fairness in medicine, we synthesised a broad range of literature.MethodsWe conducted an environmental scan of English language literature on fairness from 1960-July 31, 2021. Electronic databases Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched, supplemented by additional hand searches. Data from 213 selected publications were analysed using rapid framework analysis. Search and analysis were completed in two rounds: to explore previously identified issues (a priori), as well as those emerging from the analysis (de novo).ResultsOur synthesis identified ‘Three Pillars for Fairness’: transparency, impartiality and inclusion. We draw on these insights to propose a multidimensional conceptual framework to guide empirical research on the operationalisation of fairness in healthcare.DiscussionWe apply the conceptual framework generated by our synthesis to risk assessment in psychiatry as a case study. We argue that any claim to fairness must reflect critical assessment and ongoing social and political deliberation around these three pillars with a range of stakeholders, including patients.ConclusionWe conclude by outlining areas for further research that would bolster ongoing commitments to fairness and health equity in healthcare.

show abstract

Fair to Swear? Gendered Formulations of Fairness in Football in Turkey

Cited by 5 publications

References 39 publications

Autonomy or loyalty? Community-within-community interactions of a local football fandom group

Autonomy or loyalty? Community-within-community interactions of a local football fandom group

Sosyal Ve Kültürel Antropoloji̇de Özdüşünümselli̇k: Sahadan Örnekler

Conceptualising fairness: three pillars for medical algorithms and health equity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About