2012 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iscit.2012.6380851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair congestion control method for terminal groups with wireless random access in M2M network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cluster based access control [39] K-means and coordinator selection scheme [42] Bulk signal handling scheme [2] Signalling message compression scheme [43] Group based packet rates adjustment method [44] Figure 3.4: Congestion control mechanisms applied to core network. subgroup of MTC UEs receives this information, so that collision among themselves is manageable.…”
Section: Congestion Control Methods Applied To Cnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster based access control [39] K-means and coordinator selection scheme [42] Bulk signal handling scheme [2] Signalling message compression scheme [43] Group based packet rates adjustment method [44] Figure 3.4: Congestion control mechanisms applied to core network. subgroup of MTC UEs receives this information, so that collision among themselves is manageable.…”
Section: Congestion Control Methods Applied To Cnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , authors show the profile ID creation mechanism by reducing message size, which helps to reduce processing overhead at the system interfaces and node, respectively. Group‐based packet rates adjustment method: Two major problems will be generated by massive access: firstly, the minimum call rate that can not be assured in groups because of the RA collision and secondly, the wastage of bandwidth. The authors in proposed to change time slots, calculate and define three different packet rate: Offered Packet Rate (OPR), Available Packet Rate (APR) and Minimum Packet Rate. APR of a group is calculated by the sum of all packet rate received by BS.…”
Section: Congestion In Machine‐type Communication Over Third Generatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic overload and PRACH overload control [25], ACB and extended ACB are the best congestion control learning-based eNB selection [37], choices for congestion control prioritised RA [66], fair congestion control and PRACH overload situations. [70], code expanded random access [64], composite ACB and EAB [69] Resource management Randomness of small data In [77], resources are assigned according [77], partial time frequency allocation [75] to data types whilst in [75] small portion of radio resources of each cellular user is consumed by MTC device thus reducing the interference.…”
Section: Channel Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delay constraint scheduling [43] Does not consider Opportunistic hard priority [26] Does not consider Utility-based scheduling [48] Does not consider Resource sharing optimisation [49] Explicit energy efficiency objective Self-adaptive persistent scheduling [50] Implicit energy efficiency Ubiquitous massive access [13] Implicit energy efficiency Periodic scheduling with queue awareness [28] Does not consider QoS-aware fair scheduling [46] Implicit energy efficiency Channel awareness, unawareness [39] Implicit energy efficiency Dynamic access control [59] Does not consider Cooperative extended ACB [60] Does not consider MU-MIMIO detection [55] Does not consider Low or no mobility [51] Explicit energy efficiency objective Group based [38] Explicit energy efficient objective Client relay [87] Explicit energy efficiency objective RFSA [36] Explicit energy efficiency objective Cooperative sleep wake [81] Explicit energy efficiency objective EC minimisation [90] Explicit energy efficiency objective DRAC [91] Explicit energy efficiency objective Call admission [92] Implicit energy efficiency PRACH overload control [25] Does not consider Learning-based eNB selection [37] Implicit energy efficiency Prioritised RA [66] Does not consider Fair congestion control [70] Does not consider Code-expanded random access [64] Does not consider Composite ACB and EAB [69] Does not consider Randomness of small data [77] Does not consider Partial time frequency allocation [75] Implicit energy efficiency keep the communication system on (for listening to the medium and for control packets) is the dominant component of energy consumption, which can be controlled to extend the network lifetime. Periodic, asynchronous, on-demand sleep wake scheduling are the most common ways to minimise energy consumption.…”
Section: Access Techniques Energy Efficiency Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation